This content is no longer in use on Lexis+

Advance assurance accompanying letter—SEIS

Copyright © 2025 LexisNexis
Published by a LexisNexis Tax expert
Precedents

Advance assurance accompanying letter—SEIS

Copyright © 2025 LexisNexis

Published by a LexisNexis Tax expert

Precedents
imgtext
This content is no longer in use on Lexis+
Powered by Lexis+®
Jurisdiction(s):
United Kingdom
Related legal acts:
Key definition:
Company definition
What does Company mean?

Company denotes an association of individuals formed together for some common purpose.

Read more readmore

Popular documents

SEIS—conditions for relief: qualifying trades

SEIS—conditions for relief: qualifying tradesThe seed enterprise investment scheme (SEIS), like the enterprise investment scheme (EIS), is designed to encourage investment in smaller, higher-risk trading companies by offering a range of tax reliefs to individual investors purchasing newly issued

If a company that has only one class of ordinary share has issued ordinary shares on which investors

If a company that has only one class of ordinary share has issued ordinary shares on which investors expect to obtain EIS relief and subsequently changes its articles to create a new class of share that ranks below the EIS shares on a winding up, does that create a preference on adoption of the new

If planning permission imposes restrictions on a licensed premises opening hours, once operational can

If planning permission imposes restrictions on a licensed premises opening hours, once operational can the personal licence holder apply for a Temporary Events Notice (TEN) to open for longer hours than those permitted in the planning permission?To use any property for a licensable activity both

What is the difference between an appeal and a review?

What is the difference between an appeal and a review?What is an appeal?An appeal in insolvency proceedings is no different to an appeal in normal litigation. An appeal will be allowed only if the appeal court is satisfied that the decision of the lower court was 'wrong' or 'unjust because of a