Scheme closure

An increasing number of companies have closed their defined benefit (DB) occupational pension scheme to the accrual of future benefits and opened up a new defined contribution (DC) scheme instead for future service benefits.

Closing a scheme to future accrual of benefits is often not straightforward, and sponsoring employers and trustees will need to take into account a number of considerations before proceeding.

Where a closure proposal requires trustee consent, the trustees will need to be convinced that the employer has a good business case for closure before agreeing to the proposal. Employers should be prepared to provide evidence of their business case and to explain the financial and business impact for them if the scheme is not closed. The employer may also need to explain whether it considered any other options for reducing the costs and risks of the scheme falling short of full closure and, if so, why it discounted them.

Trustees may also look to obtain some advantage for members in return for agreeing to closure such as additional funding or security for the scheme.

Employer considerations

The main considerations for a sponsoring employer

To view the latest version of this document and thousands of others like it, sign-in with LexisNexis or register for a free trial.

Powered by Lexis+®
Latest Pensions News

Minister for Pensions hosts roundtable on ‘Pound for Pound’ initiative in shift from cost to Value for Money

The Minister for Pensions, Torsten Bell MP, has hosted a roundtable with regulators and leading pension providers to support a joined-up approach to Value for Money (VFM) in pensions. The event marked the first public discussion of the ‘Pound for Pound’ (‘£4£’) initiative, aimed at shifting the UK market from cost-based comparisons to broader value-based metrics, shifting market conversations away from cost towards value. This shift is essential for the success of the government’s proposed approach set out in the Pension Schemes Bill 2025. Insights from Australia’s superannuation system were central to the session, highlighting how clear benchmarking, transparency and regulatory oversight have transformed both member outcomes and the understanding of value in Australia. Intended to inform the impending regulatory consultation on VFM metrics, the superannuation system formed a key reference point as the discussion explored how lessons from Australia and insights from providers could shape regulatory thinking and support the development of the Pension Schemes Bill. Roundtable participants including the Department for Work and Pension, the Financial Conduct Authority, Pensions UK and a number of the Mansion House Accord signatories, agreed that now is the time for government, regulators and industry to collaborate in shaping and embedding a robust, fit-for-purpose VFM regime.

View Pensions by content type :

Popular documents