De-risking, buy-outs and mergers

The growth of funding deficits in defined benefit occupational pension schemes, together with the ever growing legal and regulatory burden of operating such schemes, has inevitably led to an increased recognition of the financial risks posed to employers by the operation of and participation in such schemes. Unsurprisingly, many employers have reacted by seeking to reduce the risks posed by their defined benefit schemes and, where possible, to eliminate those risks. Historically, employers could eliminate the risks by terminating the scheme and winding it up, although such an approach could result in pensioners suffering reductions in their pension income on retirement and could also lead to employment law complications.

Before 11 June 2003, an employer who terminated and wound up an underfunded scheme would trigger a statutory debt under the Pensions Act 1995, s 75 (a “s 75 debt”) payable to the scheme. However, at that time, the relevant basis for determining whether a scheme was underfunded on wind-up, and therefore for determining the amount of any s 75 debt, was the minimum funding requirement (“MFR”). As the MFR basis underestimated the true cost of providing members’ benefits

To view the latest version of this document and thousands of others like it, sign-in with LexisNexis or register for a free trial.

TAKE A FREE TRIAL

Latest Pensions News

Government launches consultation on the expansion of the UK Treasury Bill market

On 5 January 2026, HM Treasury and the Debt Management Office (DMO) launched a consultation on expanding and deepening the UK Treasury Bill (T-bill) market as announced in the Autumn Budget 2025. The government want to promote participation in the T-bill market through its primary market operations and the development of an active, liquid secondary market. T-bills are another source of finance for the government, issued weekly at auction by the DMO, which are sold at discount to their maturity value. They currently do not trade on any secondary market, so are generally held by investors to maturity, which can be between 1 day and 364 days after issue.

Pension pots sacrificed by 2029 salary reforms, nearly half of UK savers fear smaller pension pots under new rules

Pensions UK has published findings from research conducted by Yonder Consulting among 1,588 non-retired adults between 19 and 21 December 2025, examining awareness of upcoming salary sacrifice reforms. The findings show that 28% of defined contribution (DC) pension savers currently use salary sacrifice, yet fewer than half of respondents (41%) were aware of the changes announced in the 2025 Autumn Budget. Among existing salary sacrifice users, 62% expect to pay higher National Insurance contributions following the 2029 reforms, while 46% anticipate that less money will go into their pension savings. Behavioural responses show that 43% do not expect to change their contribution levels, while 28% indicate that they are likely to increase contributions before the reforms come into effect. Usage rates were higher among men (32%) than women (23%), and among those earning more than £48,000 (37%), compared with 16% of those earning less than £14,000.

Pension Schemes Bill clears Second Reading amid warnings of extensive amendments in Committee

Pensions analysis: The Pension Schemes Bill (the Bill) was brought from the House of Commons on 5 December 2025 where it was read a first time in the House of Lords (HoL). On 18 December 2025 the Bill was read a second time and committed to a Grand Committee for detailed scrutiny, with the order of consideration agreed. No amendments were decided at this stage, in line with standard Second Reading procedure. While the outcome of the Second Reading debate in the HoL confirmed broad support for the reforms, particularly on consolidation, the value-for-money measures and retirement defaults, it also highlighted the Bill’s investment mandation power and fiduciary duty implications as key issues for later stages. The Bill has now moved to Grand Committee which will begin a line-by-line examination of its provisions on 12 January 2026.

DBT publishes draft statutory guidance clarifying ‘significant influence or control’ for PSCs in companies and LLPs

The Department for Business and Trade (DBT) has published two draft statutory guidance documents on the meaning of ‘significant influence or control’ for the purposes of the Register of People with Significant Control (PSCs) under schedule 1A to the Companies Act 2006 (CA 2006)—one applying to companies and the other to limited liability partnerships (LLPs). Both draft guidance documents will lie before Parliament for 40 days, during which either House may resolve that they should not be approved.