Local Government weekly highlights—12 March 2026
This week's edition of Local Government weekly highlights includes the latest coverage on local government reorganisation and public procurement. Case analysis includes JR87 and another for Judicial Review, in which the Supreme Court held the provision of religious education in a NI primary school contravened human rights; Duffy v Birmingham CC, in which the court held that failure to tick the box certifying compliance with the indemnity principle does not of itself invalidate the bill of costs; CLT v LB Hounslow, in which the court found that the LA acted unlawfully in failing to treat a bereaved child as ‘looked after’ despite having a private fostering arrangement; and Dharmeshkumar v SSHCLG on the CPR 52.6 test for permission to appeal from the Planning Court. Case reports include KTS v Governing Body of Milby Primary School in which the UT allowed an appeal and permitted publishing the decisions naming the school in disability discrimination case, emphasising primacy of open justice; MB v Hertfordshire, in which the UT found an error of law in refusal to include additional provisions in an EHC plan; Housing 35 Plus Ltd v Nottingham CC, which dismissed an appeal on HMO licensing exemption in finding the management committee structure insufficient; and NHS South-West ICB v XY, in which the court refused to extend the welfare deputy’s authority to internet and social media use. This edition includes further updates on Local government reorganisation, Public procurement, Education, Governance, Children’s social care, Planning, Social housing, Adult social care, Local government finance, Healthcare, Licensing and Pensions.