IP rights and competition law

In order to reward and encourage investment and innovation, intellectual property law grants owners of intangible property the exclusive right to prevent others from exploiting their rights without their consent. IP right holders therefore have, in principle, the right to control access to (and charge others for use of) their IP rights as well as pursue enforcement of these rights through the courts where unauthorised use has occurred. However, exercising such rights may run up against competition law requirements which, broadly speaking, aim to promote open markets and curtail abuse of market power.

This subtopic addresses the interface between IP rights and competition law and highlights some of the tensions that may arise.

Chapter I prohibition and block exemptions

The Chapter I prohibition outlaws anti-competitive agreements in the UK. It reflects Article 101 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU) which applies in the EU. The wording of the Chapter I prohibition is set out in section 2 of the Competition Act 1998 (CA 1998).

For more information, see Practice Note: Chapter I prohibition.

Where an agreement is determined

To view the latest version of this document and thousands of others like it, sign-in with LexisNexis or register for a free trial.

TAKE A FREE TRIAL

Latest IP News

Crying over spilt ‘milk’? Oatly loses TM battle to Dairy UK (Dairy UK v Oatly)

IP analysis: The Court of Appeal allowed an appeal by Dairy UK Ltd and reinstated a declaration made by the UK Intellectual Property Office that Oatly AB's trade mark ‘POST MILK GENERATION’ was invalidly registered for oat-based goods. The court of appeal followed the ruling in VSW v TofuTown,and held that trade marks would fall within the definition of ‘designation’ under Regulation (EU) 1308/2013 (the ‘Regulation’) on labelling of agricultural products. Both the Regulation and VSW v TofuTown being assimilated law pursuant to the Common Organisation of the Markets in Agricultural Products Framework (Miscellaneous Amendments, etc) (EU Exit) Regulations 2019. The trade mark ‘POST MLK GENERATON’ containing the term ‘milk’ shall be used exclusively for dairy products derived from animals. The court found that the trade mark was not of such a nature as to deceive the public, however, it failed to describe any characteristic of the oat-based products in question and was invalidly registered. Written by Andrew Rigden Green, partner, head of International Arbitration at Stephenson Harwood (Hong Kong).

IP weekly highlights—12 December 2024

This week's edition of IP weekly highlights includes: a hand-picked summary of news analysis, updates and new content from the world of IP. These highlights focus on the key rights of copyright and associated rights, database rights, trade marks and passing off, designs, and patents as well as covering issues relating to confidential information, know-how R&D and IP disputes all mainly from a UK and European perspective.

EUIPO implements new renewal system for EU Registered Designs

The European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) has announced significant changes to the renewal system for Registered EU Designs (REUDs). The new rules, effective from 1 May 2025, alter the calculation of renewal periods and introduce a revised fee structure. REUDs will now expire on the exact expiry date of registration, followed by a six-month grace period. The EUIPO has outlined different procedures for renewals before and after the implementation date, allowing rights holders to choose the most advantageous renewal timing. The changes also include substantial increases in renewal fees for requests submitted on or after 1 May 2025.

Shell beats payment tech providers appeal over QR patent

Law360, London: The Court of Appeal has rejected a payment tech provider's application to revive its patent for printed QR codes in a battle with Shell, ruling that its key idea of having a 'static' code that multiple customers could use was obvious.