Q&As
Where a tenant was holding over following the expiry of a Landlord and Tenant Act 1954 (LTA 1954) tenancy, but arguably gave up occupation for the purpose of their business (by allowing a 3rd party into occupation without consent) and a notice pursuant to LTA 1954, section 24(3) was served to terminate the tenancy, what is the procedure if the landlord wants to withdraw the notice/extend the notice? Would this prejudice the landlord if it changed its mind in due course? If the section 24 notice remained and the 3rd party remains in situ what is the position on expiry of the notice?
Published on: 08 June 2017
This Q&A considers the effect of a notice under section 24(3) of the Landlord and Tenant ACT 1954 (LTA 1954) (section 24(3) notice).
Part II of the 1954 Act
LTA 1954, Pt II is a regime which provides a degree of security of tenure where the tenant uses the premises for their own business (LTA 1954, s 23(1)). Issues can arise regarding what amounts to a business and whether there is a sufficient connection
To view the latest version of this document and thousands of others like it,
sign-in with LexisNexis or register for a free trial.