Q&As
Where a lease is disclaimed leaving a sub-tenant in place paying rent to the freeholder, what options does the freeholder have while the sub-tenant continues to observe the terms of the head lease? If the head lease included the right to forfeit on the insolvency of the tenant, could the freeholder now forfeit or has the right been waived?
Where a headlease is disclaimed, the subtenant continues to have the right to occupy and must pay the rent and comply with the covenants under the headlease. The effect of sections 178(4) and 315(3) of the Insolvency Act 1986 (IA 1986) (depending on whether the headlessor is a company or an individual) is to bring to an end the rights and obligations of the immediate parties to the lease but does not affect the rights or liabilities of any other person. Although the headlease has ceased to exist it is deemed to continue in respect of the rights and liabilities of third parties such as subtenants. The landlord is not able to enforce the tenant covenants
To view the latest version of this document and thousands of others like it,
sign-in with LexisNexis or register for a free trial.