The following Competition practice note Produced in partnership with Herbert Smith Freehills provides comprehensive and up to date legal information covering:
Competition concerns relating to collective dominance and oligopolies may be dealt with in various ways under EU and UK competition laws:
Article 101 TFEU or the Chapter I Prohibition of the Competition Act 1998 (UK)
under Article 102 TFEU or the Chapter II Prohibition of the Competition Act 1998
under the EU Merger Regulation (EUMR), or
in the UK, as part of market investigations carried out by the Competition and Markets Authority (CMA).
The below addresses collective dominance and oligopoly issues outside of Article 101 TFEU.
The concept of collective dominance has been developed through case law relating to Article 102 TFEU and the EUMR. The case law suggests that this concept is the same under the two regulatory instruments, however there are important differences between the analysis in each context.
Article 102 TFEU prohibits abuses by one or more undertakings of a dominant position (see further, The prohibition on abuse of dominance).
EU case law has established that Article 102 TFEU extends to abuses of a dominant position held collectively by multiple undertakings that may not separately hold a dominant position.
In order for there to be an abuse of collective dominance in breach of Article 102 TFEU, it needs to be established that:
a collective position is held between separate undertakings
that collective position is one of dominance, and
there has been
**Trials are provided to all LexisPSL and LexisLibrary content, excluding Practice Compliance, Practice Management and Risk and Compliance, subscription packages are tailored to your specific needs. To discuss trialling these LexisPSL services please email customer service via our online form. Free trials are only available to individuals based in the UK. We may terminate this trial at any time or decide not to give a trial, for any reason. Trial includes one question to LexisAsk during the length of the trial.
To view the latest version of this document and thousands of others like it, sign-in to LexisPSL or register for a free trial.
Existing user? Sign-in
Take a free trial
When defendants are guilty, they have a choice to plead guilty or to put the prosecution to proof. When they plead guilty they may benefit from a reduction in their sentence as a result, see Practice Note: Credit for guilty plea. However, the Sentencing Council's overarching guidelines on reduction
Tipping off and prejudicing an investigationIt would undermine the benefit to the authorities if, a suspicious activity report (SAR) having been made, the alleged offender were to be made aware of the interest in their activities so that they could take steps to cover up their misdeeds or disappear.
This Practice Note looks at CE-File electronic working in the courts under CPR PD 51O, in the context of case management. It provides guidance on how to file a document electronically, deal with rejected electronic filings, issue a claim electronically, file electronic bundles (eBundles) for case
Disposal and devolutionThe equity of redemption arises as soon as the mortgage is made. It is an interest in the land which the mortgagor can:•transfer, lease or mortgage inter vivos, or•by will (it passes on intestacy)No cloggingIt is a fundamental principle of a mortgage that there must be no clog
0330 161 1234
To view our latest legal guidance content,sign-in to Lexis®PSL or register for a free trial.