Although transhipment may be impracticable on the grounds of matters such as disproportionate expense1, nevertheless the shipowner may be entitled, as agent of necessity, to tranship cargo on their owner's behalf2. His duty as regards the preservation of the goods does not come to an end with the abandonment of the voyage, and it is still his duty to consider the interests of the owner of the goods3, for example by discharging the cargo and warehousing it pending instructions4.
It is possible, however, that if there is no opportunity to consult the owner5, the shipowner's duty may include immediate transhipment
**Trials are provided to all LexisPSL and LexisLibrary content, excluding Practice Compliance, Practice Management and Risk and Compliance, subscription packages are tailored to your specific needs. To discuss trialling these LexisPSL services please email customer service via our online form. Free trials are only available to individuals based in the UK. We may terminate this trial at any time or decide not to give a trial, for any reason. Trial includes one question to LexisAsk during the length of the trial.
To view the latest version of this document and millions of others like it, sign-in to LexisLibrary or register for a free trial.
EXISTING USER? SIGN IN
TAKE A FREE TRIAL
0330 161 1234