Asset sales

In an asset sale the buyer purchases only those assets and assumes only those liabilities it wishes to acquire:

  1. sometimes an asset sale is the sale of an entire business (ie all the assets that form part of, and are used in, that business) or part of a business, but

  2. sometimes it is just a sale of an asset or a collection of assets

In this Overview:

  1. it is assumed that the parties to a sale are unconnected third parties acting on arm's length terms

  2. CGT means capital gains tax and corporation tax on chargeable gains

  3. TOGC means a transfer of a going concern for VAT purposes, and

  4. TUPE Regulations 2006 means the Transfer of Undertakings (Protection of Employment) Regulations 2006, SI 2006/246

Tax considerations in an asset sale

The tax consequences of an asset sale are generally more complex than those that would be triggered by a share sale (see Practice Note: Share sale or asset sale—tax considerations). This is because an asset sale, particularly a sale of a business, usually involves numerous assets of different types, such as:

  1. premises,

To view the latest version of this document and thousands of others like it, sign-in with LexisNexis or register for a free trial.

Powered by Lexis+®
Latest Tax News

Market value, distributions and notional transactions—key SDLT lessons from Tower One St George Wharf Ltd v HMRC

Tax analysis: In Tower One St George Wharf Ltd v HMRC, the Court of Appeal considered the basis on which stamp duty land tax (SDLT) should be assessed and whether that resulted in SDLT being paid on the market value, the actual consideration paid, or on some other basis for a complex transaction within a corporate group. The taxpayer argued that the ‘Case 3’ exception under section 54(4) of the Finance Act 2003 (FA 2003) applied, which would result in SDLT being charged on the actual consideration. HMRC argued that the exception did not apply, which would result in SDLT being paid on the market value of the property. Alternatively, HMRC argued that if the exception did apply then the anti-avoidance provisions at FA 2003, s 75A applied, potentially resulting in an even higher SDLT charge. The Court of Appeal held that although the Case 3 exception applied, the anti-avoidance provision in FA 2003, s 75A also applied. This resulted in SDLT being assessed on an aggregate amount that was even higher than the property's market value (although HMRC did not seek to increase its assessment beyond market value). Therefore, the appeal was dismissed. As explained by Jon Stevens, partner, and Rory Clarke, solicitor, at DWF Law LLP, this decision deals with the interaction of a number of complex SDLT provisions and clarifies the SDLT provisions relating to transfers to connected companies and the SDLT anti-avoidance provisions, with implications for corporate structuring and tax planning.

View Tax by content type :

Popular documents