Asset sales

Asset sales

In an asset sale the buyer purchases only those assets and assumes only those liabilities it wishes to acquire:

•
sometimes an asset sale is the sale of an entire business (ie all the assets that form part of, and are used in, that business) or part of a business, but
•
sometimes it is just a sale of an asset or a collection of assets

In this Overview:

•
it is assumed that the parties to a sale are unconnected third parties acting on arm's length terms
•
CGT means capital gains tax and corporation tax on chargeable gains
•
TOGC means a transfer of a going concern for VAT purposes, and
•
TUPE Regulations 2006 means the Transfer of Undertakings (Protection of Employment) Regulations 2006, SI 2006/246

Tax considerations in an asset sale

The tax consequences of an asset sale are generally more complex than those that would be triggered by a share sale (see Practice Note: Share sale or asset sale—tax considerations). This is because an asset sale, particularly a sale of a business, usually involves numerous assets of different types, such as:

•
premises,

To view the latest version of this document and thousands of others like it, sign-in with LexisNexis or register for a free trial.

TAKE A FREE TRIAL

Latest Tax News

Landfill tax and illegal waste disposal (John Jones v HMRC)

Environment analysis: In John Jones Civil Engineering & Groundworks Ltd v HMRC, the First-tier Tribunal (FTT) (Tax) dismissed the company’s appeal against a £547,000 landfill tax assessment on waste unlawfully deposited at a farm. The tribunal held that HMRC’s decision to levy tax on the unauthorised disposal was lawful and not ‘conspicuously unfair’ despite the appellant’s argument that an invasive plant made waste removal impossible. The case confirms that waste operators face both environmental penalties and Landfill Tax liabilities in parallel if they dispose of waste unlawfully. Environmental complications (like the presence of invasive species, such as Japanese Knotweed, or, in this case, Australian swamp stonecrop) do not excuse tax liability. Written by Stephen Sykes, head of climate, environment and sustainability law at Capital Law.

Tax weekly highlights—21 August 2025

This week's edition of Tax weekly highlights includes: (1) HMRC’s confirmation as to when the decrease in quarterly instalment-related interest rates takes effect, (2) News Analysis of the First-tier Tax Tribunal (FTT) decision in Masters on the UK tax treatment of a transferred pension under a double tax treaty and (3) the publication of the August 2025 Employer Bulletin.

FTT confirms expat’s pension linked to employment despite fund transfer (Masters v HMRC)

Tax analysis: In Masters v HMRC, the First-tier Tax Tribunal (FTT) found that withdrawals from a Self-Invested Personal Pension (SIPP) made by a former UK resident were not taxable in the UK. The necessary connection with past employment remained, despite a transfer of funds from the original scheme. Obiter, the FTT considered that ‘subject to tax’ in a contracting state, as set out in the relevant double taxation treaty (DTT), required the income to be actually taxed there.

Australian top court frees Pepsi from royalty taxes

Law360, London: Australia's top court sided with Pepsi in a long-running tax dispute on 13 August 2025, holding that the beverage giant's soft drink manufacturing agreement with an Australian company did not generate income that would warrant royalty withholding taxes.