Section 32 of the Road Traffic Regulation Act 1984 (RTRA 1984) governs the power of local authorities to provide parking places. Where the local authority considers it is necessary to provide within their area suitable parking places for vehicles for the purpose of relieving or preventing congestion of traffic, they may provide off-street parking places or authorise the use as a parking place of any part of a road within their area. By RTRA 1984, s 35, the local authority may, by order, make provision as to the use of the

See Practice Note: Choosing the LPA attorney and in particular section: ‘Replacement attorneys’, which sets out: ‘If a donor appoints more than one attorney jointly and severally, it should be stated in the LPA when the replacement attorney should act. For example, whether the replacement attorney

In considering whether the respective shares of the property pass to the sons on a beneficial joint tenancy or a tenancy in common the terms of the Wills of each of the parents should be checked. It is common for property to be left ‘equally’ or in ‘equal shares’, which is indicative of a tenancy in common (see below). Commentary: Concurrent gifts—joint tenancy and tenancy in common: Williams on Wills [86.1] from which the following extracts are taken may be useful for your purposes: ‘Dispositions to tenants in common or as joint tenants of real estate no longer take effect as trusts for sale but are held on simple trusts of land and take effect in trust for the persons interested in the land. The personal representatives will hold the land on trust for the beneficial tenants in common

We refer you to COP GN2 Guidance on the sale of jointly owned property, which explains that when two or more people own real property together, they are referred to as the trustees of that property. If one or more of those trustees becomes incapable of managing their property and affairs, they will not be able to sign any legally binding documents dealing with the property. If such a property is to

In terms of this Q&A, it is left unspecified whether the order providing for the subject child to receive therapy limits the information that should go to one or either of the parents. In the event the order does include a specific issue order setting out the extent of the information that should go to the paying party, the therapist should duly follow that direction. Assuming that the order does not limit the information that should be provided to one or other of the parents, the parents have the same entitlement to information regardless of who pays and who organises

Jurisdiction in relation to proceedings under Schedule 1 to the Children Act 1989 (ChA 1989) is governed by ChA 1989, Sch 1, para 14, which was amended with the effect from 31 December 2020 (implementation period (IP) completion day) by the Jurisdiction and Judgments (Family) (Amendment etc) (EU Exit) Regulations 2019, SI 2019/519 (as amended by SI 2019/836). If the proceedings were commenced prior to IP completion day, they are governed by the original ChA 1989, Sch 1, para 14 under the transitional provisions contained

It is now rare that a court will make an order for joint lives maintenance (ie an order for spousal maintenance that would continue until the payee remarried, the payer or payee died, or further order). Section 25A(2) of the Matrimonial Causes Act 1973 (MCA 1973) provides that: ‘Where the court decides in such a case to make a periodical payments or secured periodical payments order in favour of a party to the marriage, the court shall in particular consider whether it would be appropriate to require those payments to be made or secured only for such term as would in the opinion of the court be sufficient to enable the party in whose favour the order is made to adjust without undue hardship to the

The procedural rules of the First-tier Tribunal (FTT) (Property Chamber) are contained in the Tribunal Procedure (First-tier Tribunal) (Property Chamber) Rules 2013 (the Property Chamber Rules), SI 2013/1169. Property Chamber Rules, SI 2013/1169, r 35 provides that the FTT may, at the request of the parties, make a consent order disposing of the proceedings and making such other provision as the parties have agreed. However, Property Chamber Rules, SI 2013/1169, r 35(1) makes clear that the FTT may only do so ‘if it considers it appropriate’. Pursuant to Property Chamber Rules, SI 2013/1169, r 35(2), the FTT does not need to hold a hearing before making a consent order and does not need

Business property relief (BPR) was introduced by the Finance Act 1976 and has developed over the years. The aim of the relief is to ensure that a family-owned business could survive as a going concern rather than having to be sold or broken up in order to pay inheritance tax. Where assets qualify for BPR and are held by the settlor for at least two years, there is no entry charge for the settlement of the relevant assets into trust. There is also no inheritance tax charge in respect of the trust, even if the settlor dies within seven years of settling the assets into the trust, and

The following documents are copies of the provisions

We have found the following Commentaries that should assist you in drafting a claim for your particular circumstances: • Particulars of claim by customer against hairdressing salon for dermatitis caused by ‘own brand’ hair shampoo: Atkin's Court Forms [82] • Claim for damages for having contracted Legionnaires Disease from bacteria escaping from the Defendants' premises, alleging negligence, nuisance, and liability pursuant

We refer you to the following Precedent which you may be able to adapt for your purposes: • Particulars of claim by holiday maker who is injured in a slipping accident whilst