This Practice Note concerns multi-contract arbitration, joinder and consolidation pursuant to the 2023 Arbitration Rules of the Stockholm Chamber of Commerce (SCC) Arbitration Institute (the 2023 SCC Rules). The 2023 SCC Rules apply to SCC arbitrations commenced on or after 1 January 2023, unless the parties agree otherwise. Introduction to multi-contract arbitration, joinder and consolidation The nature of today’s international business often involves chains of transactions and multiple contracts with multiple parties. This increases the likelihood of disputes involving multiple contracts and/or multiple parties. However, since arbitration is a consensual process which parties enter into by means of an arbitration agreement or an arbitration clause, procedural complications often arise in situations involving multiple contracts and/or multiple parties. There is therefore a need for arbitration rules to address such procedural complications. To meet this need, institutional rules need to provide solutions for the resolution of connected issues in a single arbitration, in order to save time and costs and to avoid conflicting decisions in parallel proceedings. The 2023 SCC Rules and the 2023 Expedited Rules

This Practice Note concerns starting an arbitration under the 2023 Arbitration Rules of the Stockholm Chamber of Commerce (SCC) Arbitration Institute (the 2023 SCC Rules). The 2023 SCC Rules apply to SCC arbitrations commenced on or after 1 January 2023, unless the parties agree otherwise. Considerations before filing a Request for Arbitration Pre-arbitration considerations The decision to start arbitration proceedings must be considered carefully. An arbitration constitutes a considerable investment in both money and time and prospective claimants are therefore advised to consider the issues carefully before they submit a request for arbitration. Relevant issues include the following: • has the claimant exhausted relevant pre-arbitration settlement opportunities? • does the claimant have good prospects of success? This often includes an analysis of both legal and factual issues. Do the relevant contractual and legal provisions support the claimant’s case? Does the documentary and witness evidence support the claimant’s case? • how much is the arbitration likely to cost? This is often an almost impossible question for counsel to answer at the start of a case

This Practice Note concerns making the award pursuant to the 2023 Arbitration Rules of the Stockholm Chamber of Commerce (SCC) Arbitration Institute (the 2023 SCC Rules). The 2023 SCC Rules apply to SCC arbitrations commenced on or after 1 January 2023, unless the parties agree otherwise. Making the award When the tribunal declares the proceedings closed, its remaining task is to make and render an award. The provisions under the 2023 SCC Rules on the making of the award are as follows (2023 SCC Rules, art 42): • the award shall be made in writing • the award shall include the date of the award and the seat of the arbitration • unless otherwise agreed by the parties, it shall state the reasons on which the award is based • the arbitrators shall sign the award. If providing the reasons for the omission of a signature, it is sufficient that a majority of the arbitrators sign the award, or failing a majority, that the chairperson signs the award • the tribunal sends a copy of the award

This Practice Note concerns the tribunal pursuant to the 2023 Arbitration Rules of the Stockholm Chamber of Commerce (SCC) Arbitration Institute (the 2023 SCC Rules). The 2023 SCC Rules apply to SCC arbitrations commenced on or after 1 January 2023, unless the parties agree otherwise. The SCC has published a guide providing an overview of the role of administrative or tribunal secretaries under the 2023 SCC Rules and the SCC Expedited Arbitration Rules. Secretaries are not members of the tribunal but assist tribunals with procedural and administrative tasks, ensuring proceedings run smoothly. For further information on appointments and the role of secretaries, see: LNB News 22/09/2026 12. The number of arbitrators The parties may agree on the number of arbitrators in a SCC arbitration (2023 SCC Rules, art 16(1)). In the absence of an agreement between the parties, the Board shall decide whether the tribunal shall consist of one or three arbitrators, taking into account the complexity of the case, the amount in dispute and any other relevant circumstances (2023 SCC Rules, art 16(2)). Note that

The SCC Arbitration Institute (SCC) and the London Court of International Arbitration (LCIA) will host a joint webinar on 3 November 2026 to discuss the role of artificial intelligence (AI) in international arbitration. The discussion will examine the use of AI in arbitral proceedings, including the distinction between AI tools and tribunal secretaries, the circumstances in which disclosure of AI use may be required or appropriate and the information that should be disclosed. It will also consider existing rules and guidelines, potential gaps in the current framework and confidentiality risks associated with submitting case materials to AI systems. The panel will discuss practical recommendations for arbitral tribunals, parties and counsel on navigating the use of AI in arbitration. The webinar will bring together institutional representatives, legal practitioners, arbitrators and technical specialists to examine these issues from different perspectives.

The SCC Arbitration Institute, in collaboration with the Silicon Valley Arbitration and Mediation Center (SVAMC), will host a webinar on the role of artificial intelligence (AI) in arbitrator selection, scheduled for 19 May 2026. The webinar will focus on whether AI algorithms can enhance neutrality, diversity and efficiency in the selection process without compromising procedural legitimacy and party autonomy. Key discussion topics will include ethical safeguards, the empirical validation of neutrality and the potential for hybrid models that integrate human judgment with algorithmic insights. The event will convene practitioners, technologists and institutional leaders to explore the balance between automation and human oversight.

The Stockholm Chamber of Commerce (SCC) Arbitration Institute has announced its support for the sixth Arab Arbitration Conference, taking place on 3–4 October 2025 in Cairo, Egypt. The conference will explore challenges and solutions shaping arbitration practice across the Arab region. It will host over 250 participants and more than 40 expert speakers, with interactive discussions on key issues, including: (1) recent reforms to arbitration laws in major jurisdictions such as England and France; (2) enforcement of arbitral awards, including against sovereign entities; (3) the role of technology and third-party funding in arbitration; and (4) Arab judicial precedents in the context of international practice.

The SCC Arbitration Institute (SCC) has introduced a new policy guiding its decisions on arbitration seats in EU investment cases. The seat of arbitration refers to the legal jurisdiction, not physical location. This policy clarifies how the SCC will navigate EU law complexities and the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) rulings to ensure enforceable awards in intra-EU investment treaty arbitrations.

The Stockholm Chamber of Commerce (SCC) Arbitration Institute has published a survey inviting its users to submit suggestions for potential additions or amendments to its existing SCC Arbitration Rules and the SCC Expedited Arbitration Rules. The institute is actively asking for feedback from users regarding potential amendments and additions to the existing framework. This consultative approach demonstrates the SCC's commitment to maintaining rules that are relevant, equitable and user-centric. Stakeholders are invited to submit their suggestions through dedicated surveys available in both English and Swedish.

The Stockholm Chamber of Commerce (SCC) Arbitration Institute published its 2025 annual statistics, reporting a record 213 new cases involving 568 parties from 50 countries. The caseload comprised 107 international disputes and 106 domestic Swedish disputes, with total amount in dispute reaching €4.6 billion. Under the SCC Arbitration Rules, the average amount in dispute was €16 million, while under the SCC Expedited Arbitration Rules it was €2.5 million, representing the highest average recorded under those rules and more than three times the 2024 figure. Construction disputes increased to 57 cases from 28 in 2024. The SCC registered 114 cases under the SCC Arbitration Rules and 82 under the SCC Expedited Arbitration Rules, alongside three emergency arbitrator proceedings. Stockholm served as the seat of arbitration in 72% of cases, with Swedish law applying in 68% of proceedings. Women comprised 33% of all 289 arbitrator appointments, with the SCC Board appointing women in 48% of its appointments, compared to only 23% of those appointed by the parties.

The SCC Arbitration Institute has published Nordic Commercial Arbitration Forum 2025 – Nordic Arbitration: A Strategic Choice for Business, a comprehensive volume showcasing contributions from leading practitioners and academics following the inaugural Nordic Commercial Arbitration Forum held in Stockholm on 11 March 2025. The publication explores the strategic advantages of choosing Nordic seats for arbitration, highlighting the region’s neutrality, efficiency, and strong rule-of-law traditions. It also features the 2025 Survey Report on Nordic Arbitral Institutions and the 2024 Survey on Challenging Arbitral Awards in the Nordics, offering insight into current trends, institutional practices, and procedural developments across Denmark, Finland, Iceland, Norway, and Sweden.

The Arbitration Institute of the Stockholm Chamber of Commerce (SCC) has published a report titled ‘Settlements in cases administered under the SCC Rules,’ providing valuable empirical insights into settlement dynamics within institutional arbitration. This study not only sheds light on procedural efficiencies but also offers guidance to practitioners, users, and institutions seeking to promote early resolution of disputes.