Claim No. [INSERT] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE [SPECIFY DIVISION] [[INSERT LOCATION] DISTRICT REGISTRY] Parties:- [Insert name]        Claimant - and - [Insert name]        Defendant ––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––– PARTICULARS OF CLAIM ––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––– Note: This Precedent refers to statutory duties for construction accidents which have occurred on or after 6 April 2015. 1 At all material times the Claimant was employed by the Defendant as a Painting Supervisor. 2 On or around [insert date] the Claimant was performing his ordinary duties for the Defendant and was tasked with inspecting a newly built platform module at [insert location]. 3 As the Claimant walked along the platform suddenly and without warning he fell through a piece of missing grating. The Claimant fell through the gap created by the missing grating to the next level below on the platform, striking his head and body. 4 At all material times the provisions of the Work at Height Regulations 2005, SI 2005/735, Management of Health and Safety at Work Regulations 1999, SI 1999/3242 and Workplace (Health, Safety

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE [[INSERT DIVISION]] [[INSERT LOCATION] DISTRICT REGISTRY] Parties [Insert the Claimant’s name] by [his OR her] litigation friend [Insert the Litigation Friend’s name]        Claimant -and- [Insert the Defendant’s name]        Defendant _____________________________________________________________________________ PARTICULARS OF CLAIM _____________________________________________________________________________ INTRODUCTION 1 The Claimant seeks a declaration and damages arising from the raid on [his OR her] home on [insert date] and [his OR her] subsequent detention between [insert date] and [insert date]. 2 In summary, the Claimant claims that: 2.1 On [insert date], during the course of the raid on the Claimant’s home, the Claimant suffered a number of assaults and batteries and/or breaches of Article 3 ECHR, and suffered false imprisonment and/or a breach of Article 5 ECHR; 2.2 The Claimant’s detention between [insert date] and [insert date] was false imprisonment and/or a breach of Article 5 ECHR. 3 The Defendant is, and was at all material times, responsible for the actions of the [insert the name of the detaining authority], its officers and/or servants and/or agents. The Claimant’s claim against the Defendant relates

Claim No: [insert number] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE KING'S BENCH DIVISION Fatal Mesothelioma Claim BETWEEN: [name of Claimant]        Claimant (Personal Representative of the estate of [insert name], Deceased) -and- B COMPANY LTD        Defendant _____________________________________________________________________________ PARTICULARS OF CLAIM _____________________________________________________________________________ The claimant 1 The claimant is the widow and personal representative of the estate of [name] (‘the deceased’). 2 The claimant brings this claim on behalf of the estate pursuant to the Law Reform (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act 1934 and on behalf of herself as the deceased’s dependant widow pursuant to the Fatal Accidents Act 1976. The deceased’s employment by the defendant and his exposure to asbestos in the course thereof 3 The deceased, who was born on [insert date], was employed by the defendant (company registration number XX and when it was then known as XX Limited) as a bricklayer and labourer from 1958 until 1971 and during the course of this employment he was exposed to foreseeably harmful levels of respirable asbestos fibre and/or which exposure was

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE [[SPECIFY DIVISION]] [[INSERT LOCATION] DISTRICT REGISTRY] FATAL MESOTHELIOMA CLAIM Claim No: [insert number] Between: C (EXECUTRIX IN THE ESTATE OF [name of deceased] (DECEASED))        Claimant -and- D LTD        Defendant _____________________________________________________________________________ PARTICULARS OF CLAIM _____________________________________________________________________________ 1 The claimant is the executrix in the estate of [name] (‘the deceased’), a grant of probate having been issued by the Ipswich Probate Registry on [date]. She brings this action on behalf of the estate of the deceased pursuant to the provisions of the Law Reform (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act 1934 and on behalf of the deceased’s dependants pursuant to the Fatal Accidents Act 1976. 2 The deceased was employed by the Defendant in its garage at [town] as a mechanic and then as a panel beater and welder, from 1960 to 2005. 3 The deceased’s work involved carrying out repairs and maintenance of vehicles. In the course of such work, the deceased: 3.1 carried out maintenance and repair work to vehicle brakes. This involved removing old brake shoes and brake

IN THE COUNTY COURT AT [insert] Claim No. [insert number] Parties (1) AA (2) BB        Claimants -and- CC        Defendant ______________________ PARTICULARS OF CLAIM ______________________ 1 At all material times the Defendant carried on business as a tour operator supplying package holidays to travellers. 2 On 2 July 2025 the First Claimant visited the website of the Defendant where she entered into an agreement to purchase a package holiday in Greece with the Defendant. The agreement was for the First Claimant and her husband, the Second Claimant, to fly from East Midlands Airport to Athens on 8 August 2025, from where they were to transfer onwards to Santorini. The contract then provided for the First Claimant and Second Claimant to fly from Santorini to Athens and onwards to East Midlands Airport on 15 August 2025. After the completion of the agreement for flights, the Claimants’ names and the First Claimant’s payment details and email address were supplied by the Defendant to D Hotels Ltd via a website link. The First Claimant then booked from the website of D Hotels Ltd a seven night stay at the

col style="width: 50%;"> IN THE COUNTY COURT AT [insert] Claim No: [insert claim number] BETWEEN MR A B        Claimant -and- C D LIMITED        Defendant _____________________________________________________________________________ PARTICULARS OF CLAIM _____________________________________________________________________________ 1 All material times the Defendant owned and/or operated a business [description of business, eg collecting and processing refuse]. 2 At all material times the Claimant was employed by the Defendant as a [job title eg dustbin lorry driver and loader]. Details of Incident 3 At around [time] on [date] the Claimant was [description of work activities being undertaken] at [location] in the course of their employment. 4 The Claimant was wearing liveried clothing and personal protective equipment issued to them by the Defendant. This consisted of [details of equipment, eg Type 1 gloves, which extended approximately three centimetres up the Claimant’s forearm above his wrist, and a short-sleeved company-branded T-shirt]. 5 As the Claimant was [description of the incident, eg collecting loose rubbish sacks, they felt a sharp prick on the exposed portion of their forearm, approximately two centimetres above the glove line]. 6 The Claimant discovered upon inspection that [description of the cause, eg they had been pricked by a needle,

Claim No. [insert claim number] [IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE [ [BUSINESS AND PROPERTY DIVISION OR KING’S BENCH DIVISION] ] [Insert court, list or sub-list and venue as appropriate] OR THE COUNTY COURT AT [insert location] [BUSINESS AND PROPERTY WORK] ] BETWEEN: [insert name]        Claimant and [insert name]        Defendant _______________________________________ [ Draft ] particulars of claim _______________________________________ 1 The Claimant[s] [is OR are] [insert details]. 2 The Defendant[s] [is OR are] [insert details]. 3 In or around [insert date] the Claimant[s]

Court Reference No:[ insert claim number] [ IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE BUSINESS AND PROPERTY DIVISION INSOLVENCY AND COMPANIES LIST, ROLLS BUILDING, LONDON OR IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE BUSINESS AND PROPERTY DIVISION INSOLVENCY AND COMPANIES LIST IN [insert location] OR IN THE COUNTY COURT AT [insert location] BUSINESS AND PROPERTY WORK ] IN THE MATTER OF [insert company’s name] AND IN THE MATTER OF THE INSOLVENCY ACT 1986 BETWEEN [Insert name of the Claimant] Claimant AND [Insert name of the First Defendant] First Defendant [Insert name of the Second Defendant] Second Defendant PARTICULARS OF CLAIM 1 This claim concerns a transaction entered into by the company in liquidation, [insert name of the company] (the Company), involving [insert brief summary, for example the supply of defective widgets by the First Defendant to the Company and the subsequent transfer by the First Defendant of its business and assets to the Second Defendant on or around [insert date]]. Background 2 The Claimant is the liquidator of the Company. 3 The principal business of the Company was [insert details]. 4 The Defendants are companies incorporated in England and Wales. The First Defendant was

[ In the COUNTY COURT AT [insert] OR In the High Court of Justice ] [ [Specify division] ] [ [Insert location] District Registry ] Claim No: Between [Insert name]        Claimant and [Insert name]        First Defendant Second Defendant ________________________________________________ Particulars of claim ________________________________________________ 1 At all relevant times, the Claimant was working as a [insert job title eg Delivery Driver] for [insert employer’s name eg Plant Hire Limited]. In the course of [his OR her] work, on [insert date of accident], [he OR she] was required to deliver a power float (‘the float’) to the First Defendant’s premises at [insert address]. 2 Upon the Claimant’s arrival at the premises, the First Defendant explained to the Claimant that he intended to unload the float from the truck using a JCB. The First Defendant explained to the Claimant that there would be various people on site who would assist in this process. The Claimant assumed (reasonably) that the First Defendant was the contractor who had hired the float or was otherwise in authority on the site and assented to the course of action

Claim No. [insert claim no] IN THE COUNTY COURT AT [insert] Between 1 Mr X Y Claimant - and - 2 Y Z LTD Defendant _____________________________________________________________________________ PARTICULARS OF CLAIM _____________________________________________________________________________ 1 The Claimant was at all material times employed by the Defendant as a [insert job title] at the Defendant’s [insert as appropriate] premises. 2 [At all material times the provisions of the Provision and Use of Work Equipment Regulations 1998 as amended by the Control of Vibration at Work Regulations 2005 [which came into force on the 6 July 2005] applied.] 3 In the course of [his OR her] employment between the dates of [insert date] and [insert date] the Claimant was regularly required to use vibrating tools [give full details of tools, and hours worked on tools per shift/working day, or frequency of use of tools]. This caused [his OR her] injury. 4 It is the Claimant’s case that at all relevant times the Defendant had or ought to have had knowledge that the exposure to vibration [use of the relevant equipment OR repetitive actions] posed a foreseeable risk of injury and that

This Checklist covers the particulars that must be included by a tenant or landlord applying to the First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) (FTT), by the Tribunal Procedure (First-tier Tribunal) (Property Chamber) Rules (the Property Chamber Rules), SI 2013/1169. It includes in particular details of the prescribed information to be included in an application concerning the right to acquire the freehold or an extended lease of property under the Leasehold Reform Act 1967 (LRA 1967). Information only required for applications under other statutes is omitted. If there is a failure to comply with the requirements in the Property Chamber Rules, practice directions or tribunal directions, the tribunal may take whatever action it considers just, including waiving the requirement or requiring the failure to be remedied. In practice, a minor error is unlikely to be fatal if the particulars and documents included with an application are sufficient to enable the application

means the Seller and Buyer and Party shall mean either one of them as applicable