Arbitration analysis: This case involved ten contracts by five Brazilian entities (collectively ‘CBF’) to sell pig iron to Steel Base Trade AG (SBT). Because of an alleged breach of the contracts by SBT, CBF commenced an ICC arbitration against SBT in Paris, eventually obtaining an arbitral award for US$48,053,462.16. Prior to the issuance of the award, Mr. Hans Mende, a named Defendant in the New York lawsuit, stripped SBT of all assets and transferred them to Price Carbon Ltd for $1. Prime Carbon retained SBT’s liability to CBF. As part of the asset transfer, Prime Carbon gained control of Primetrade, Inc, a valuable subsidiary. Further, Prime Carbon transferred ownership of Primetrade, Inc to other entities associated with Mende in order to further insulate Mende and Prime Carbon’s assets from CBF. Subsequently, CBF moved to enforce the award by filing the lawsuit in the SDNY and argued that it should be permitted to pierce the corporate veil and make SBT’s shareholders, directors and affilited companies (the Defendants) liable for the arbitral award. CBF also alleged that Prime Carbon and Primetrade are alter egos of SBT and are thus liable under alter ego theory. Finally, CBF alleged that American Metals & Coal International, Inc and AMCI Holdings, two other named Defendants, are alter egos of Mr. Mendes and thus are liable for the award. Defendants’ moved for summary judgment seeking to dismiss the action on multiple grounds. Relavant to this article, Defendants’ argued in their motíon for summary judgment that the SDNY cannot enforce the award on alter ego or veil piercing grounds. The SDNY denied Defendants’ motions on these grounds, and held that under Swiss law, Prime Carbon and Primetrade could be alter egos of SBT so as to permit Defendants to be held liable for the arbitral award. Written by Charles H Camp, President, and Genna Portner and Elisa Cerri, of the Law Offices of Charles H. Camp, PC, Washington, DC. See www.charlescamplaw.com.