Restructuring & Insolvency analysis: Liquidators of a public limited company, Torotrak plc (the company), had made distributions to creditors in full and were now faced with a limited surplus and over 8,500 members, many of whom were individuals, residing around the globe. How could the court balance issues of proportionality, fairness and the restrictive wording of section 107 of the Insolvency Act 1986 (IA 1986)? Could the liquidators limit a distribution to the top 81 shareholders, ensuring any dividend was meaningful or apply the procedure for proofs of debt by creditors to all members, ensuring any dividend was fair? What were the practical steps to be taken by the liquidators to trace and engage with members? The court made pragmatic directions, as to tracing members and inviting claims by members by a cut-off date, gave the liquidators relief from any liability under section 1157 of the Companies Act 2006 (CA 2006) and increased their remuneration cap in respect of the distribution of the surplus. Written by Lisa Linklater KC (leading counsel for the liquidators at the hearing before His Honour Judge Hodge KC, sitting as a High Court judge) and Joel Finnan, Exchange Chambers.