Intestacy definition

View the related checklists about Intestacy

Taking instructions in a Family provision claim—checklist

Taking instructions in a Family provision claim—checklist The Inheritance (Provision for Family and Dependants) Act 1975—checklist for taking instructions 1 Applicant’s name 2 Address 3 Date of birth/age 4 Single, married, cohabiting? 5 Deceased’s details• Name • Date of birth/age • Domicile 6 Section 1 status• Spouse/civil partner • Former spouse/civil partner • Child of deceased • Treated as child of family • Maintained by deceased • Cohabitee – same household for 2 years before death 7 Basis of claim

View the related flowcharts about Intestacy

Intestacy in Scotland (surviving spouse)—flowchart

Intestacy in Scotland (surviving spouse)—flowchart This content is produced in partnership with Scots

View the related practice notes about Intestacy

Intestacy—beneficial entitlement

Total intestacyA total intestacy occurs when all of the deceased's property is undisposed of because:•the deceased did not make a Will•the deceased left an invalid Will•the deceased's Will was revoked•the Will does not contain any disposition of the deceased's property, or•the Will, although valid, fails to be effective because, for instance, the sole beneficiary predeceased the deceasedIntestacy rules applicable on total intestacyIf the deceased died intestate, Parts III and IV of the Administration of Estates Act 1925 (AEA 1925) apply to:•all the movable property of the deceased wherever situated, provided the intestate was domiciled in England and Wales, and•all immovable property of the deceased in England or Wales, whether the deceased was domiciled in England and Wales or elsewhereThe intestacy rules apply to the residuary estate of the deceased not otherwise disposed of, ie the property that remains after all of the deceased's debts have been paid and any valid legacies effected. The rules apply only to property that could have been disposed of under the deceased's Will had they...

Intestacy—summary

The intestacy rulesIf the deceased died totally or partially intestate, either because they did not leave a valid Will or part of their Will is invalid or ineffective, Parts III and IV of the Administration of Estates Act 1925 (AEA 1925) apply to:•all the deceased’s movable property wherever situated, provided the intestate was domiciled in England and Wales, and•all the deceased’s immovable property in England or Wales, wherever the deceased was domiciledEnquiriesA thorough search should be made to ascertain if the deceased made a Will.If no Will is found, enquiries should be made of the deceased’s next of kin and any known advisers that the deceased had instructed in their lifetime in relation to estate planning to ascertain whether a Will was made and lost. See Practice Note: Obtaining the Will.Reasons for total intestacyThere is no statutory definition of intestacy.A total intestacy occurs when none of the deceased’s property is disposed of because:•the deceased did not make a Will•the Will was ineffective•the Will was revoked, either expressly or by operation...

View the related precedents about Intestacy

Residential conveyancing—conveyancer’s letter of advice to buyers on co-ownership

Residential conveyancing—conveyancer’s letter of advice to buyers on co-ownership [insert names and address of clients] Date [insert date] Dear [insert names of clients] Re: Proposed purchase of [insert address of property] As you are purchasing the above property together, it is necessary for you to decide whether you are going to hold the property as: • joint tenants, or • tenants in common This is an important distinction because it governs how your respective interests in the property will be treated. Joint tenants If you hold the property as joint tenants, you will both own the whole of the property rather than a specific share of the property. If the property is sold while you hold it as joint tenants, the sale proceeds will be shared between you equally. The most important effect of holding the property as joint tenants is that you cannot leave an interest held as a joint tenant to anyone in your will. If you die, your interest in the property does not form part of...

Final receipt paying residuary beneficiary

Final receipt paying residuary beneficiary [enter name of firm] [enter firm’s address] In the estate of the late [enter name of deceased] I [enter name of beneficiary] of [enter address] confirm receipt of the sum of £[enter amount] from [enter

View the related q&as about Intestacy

If an individual dies intestate leaving several minor children with different (surviving) co-parents and two of those surviving parents take out the grant of letters of administration for the use and benefit of their respective minor children, how would the grant be expressed and would the administrators have authority to deal with the whole estate?

If an individual dies intestate leaving several minor children with different (surviving) co-parents and two of those surviving parents take out the grant of letters of administration for the use and benefit of their respective minor children, how would the grant be expressed and would the administrators have authority to deal with the whole estate? We refer you to Practice Note: Intestacy—priority to apply for grant—Q&As (at 'Particular relatives and entitlement to grant on intestacy', 'Minor children only'). Where a person to whom a grant would otherwise be made is a minor (eg where the deceased was survived by minor children but not a spouse or civil partner), the Non-Contentious Probate Rules 1987 (NCPR 1987), SI 1987/2024, r 32 sets out that a grant of administration for the minor’s use and benefit, limited until they attain the age of 18 years, shall be granted to a parent of the minor or other person who has parental responsibility. Commentary: Grants for the use and benefit of minors: Tolley’s Administration of Estates...

View the related News about Intestacy

Private Client weekly highlights—1 May 2025

This week’s edition of Private Client highlights includes: (1) Hubbard v Hubbard, where the lack of credible evidence resulted in the disallowance of a claim for trustee expenses; (2) NHS South East London ICB v JP & the Royal Hospital for Neuro-Disability, which considered issues of dignity, delay, and declarations on best interests; (3) R (YVR) v Birmingham City Council, a decision involving adult social care charging policies, the public sector equality duty, and severely disabled adults; (4) HMRC publishes Tax update spring 2025; (5) CIOT’s response to the consultation on reforms to agricultural property relief and business property relief concerning their application in relation to trusts; (6) Patel v Patel, where the High Court resolved a dispute between two executors over the funeral arrangements for their father, and (7) the Courts and Tribunals Judiciary publishes updated AI guidance and introduces Copilot Chat for judges.

Private Client weekly highlights—17 April 2025

This week’s edition of Private Client highlights includes: (1) Changizi v Changizi, where a non-exempt beneficiary’s share of estate was liable for IHT under Re Ratcliffe; (2) Argyll and Bute Council v RF (by his litigation friend, the Official Solicitor), in which the Court of Protection refuses an application for recognition and enforcement of a Scottish Guardianship order; (3) Abbasi v Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust; Haastrup v King’s College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, in which the Supreme Court held that anonymity for clinicians in withdrawal of treatment cases involving children should normally be of limited duration; (4) Companies House launches a new voluntary identity verification service; (5) Armstrong v Bhattacharya, which highlights the importance of clear, contemporaneous documentary evidence and a consistent case in circumstances where a person wishes to demonstrate that ownership of a property differs to that which is recorded at HM Land Registry; (6) Tedford v Clarke, in which the court held that although a Will was badly drafted, it was not meaningless and...