I Definition

View the related checklists about I

Ireland—Determining jurisdiction in civil litigation—checklist

Ireland—Determining jurisdiction in civil litigation—checklist This Checklist offers guidance on how to determine whether an Irish court has jurisdiction to deal with the specific civil dispute. In doing so, it considers provisions under Brussels I (recast), the Lugano Convention and the Hague Convention on Choice of Court Agreements. This Checklist provides an overview of jurisdiction in terms of considering whether the dispute should be dealt with in Ireland. For guidance on: • which specific court an action should be raised in, see Practice Note: Ireland—Starting a civil action • other issues to consider before bringing a civil claim in an Irish court and how to start and progress a civil claim in Ireland, see Practice Notes: Ireland—Starting a civil action and Ireland—Pre-action conduct, and in initiating and case managing a civil claim, Ireland—Progressing and managing a High Court civil claim respectively • other aspects of Irish civil litigation, see: Ireland—Alternative dispute resolution and settlement—overview which links through to detailed guidance on specific aspects of dispute resolution in Ireland This Checklist...

Remote execution of documents resources—checklist

Remote execution of documents resources—checklist Remote execution of documents has become increasingly popular. This Checklist of resources sets out some of the considerations for remote execution of documents when parties are not able to meet in person. Key commercial resources We have produced a collection that is a comprehensive, interactive resource to help users identify and work through the concepts and common issues when executing documents, including information relating to remote execution. Each section or phase includes practical guidance, precedent clauses and Q&As relevant to that section. For more information, see: Execution collection. This Checklist considers remote execution from a general commercial perspective only and assumes that the agreements are subject to English law. For general information and guidance relating to execution, see: Execution—overview. For more specific guidance on execution requirements in other Practice Areas please check that Practice Area’s content. The Law Society has also brought together a variety of established guidance on execution of documents by virtual means, execution of documents using electronic signatures, its ‘Tips on how to operate in...

View the related practice notes about I

Disclosure—solicitors' obligations

Disclosure—solicitors' obligations This Practice Note identifies solicitors’ obligations in relation to disclosure to their client and the court. It also explains the need to preserve documents, provide the required disclosure and co-operate with the other side particularly in relation to electronic disclosure (e-disclosure). This Practice Note does not cover the provisions of the disclosure scheme operating in the Business and Property Courts. For guidance, see: Disclosure scheme—overview. Obligations Throughout the disclosure process you have obligations to your client, to the court and in accordance with other relevant provisions. These include, but are not limited to: • advising your client of the need to preserve documents—see further: Preservation of documents • ensuring your client complies with all relevant and applicable provisions and makes compliant disclosure—see further: Full disclosure • co-operating with the other side, specifically in relation to e-disclosure and/or where the claim is proceeding on the multi-track and does not involve a claim for personal injury—see further: Co-operating with the other side • a reasonable duty to manage...

Relief from sanctions—making or opposing an application

Relief from sanctions—making or opposing an application This Practice Note gives practical guidance on how to make or oppose (or defend) an application for relief from sanctions (RFS) under CPR 3.9. In particular, it covers the evidence in support of an application for relief, the evidence in response to a relief from sanctions application, costs issues in relief applications and how to appeal a decision granting or refusing relief. Throughout it offers general practical tips on applying for relief from sanctions. This Practice Note should be read in conjunction with Practice Notes: • How to make an application for a court order (CPR 23) • Relief from sanctions—when is an application for relief required? • Case management—compliance • Relief from sanctions—the courts’ approach • Relief from sanctions—illustrative decisions (from 1 January 2024); and • Interim applications—costs recovery See also Precedents: • Letter requesting consent to application for relief from sanctions • Letter responding to request for consent to relief from sanctions • Draft order for relief from sanctions...

View the related precedents about I

Tax disclosure—bond issue offering document

United Kingdom Taxation General The summary set out below describes certain taxation matters of the United Kingdom based on the Issuer’s understanding of current law and HM Revenue & Customs (HMRC) published practice as at the date of this document, both of which are subject to change, possibly with retrospective effect. The summary is intended as a general guide only and is not intended to be, nor should it be construed to be, tax or legal advice. The summary applies only to persons who are the absolute beneficial owners of Bonds, who hold their Bonds as investments and who are resident and, in the case of individual shareholders, domiciled in the UK for taxation purposes at all relevant times. In particular Bondholders holding their Bonds through a depositary receipt system or clearance service should note that they may...

Adjudication clause—construction contracts

Adjudication 1 Any dispute or difference arising under or in connection with this [agreement OR Contract] may be referred to an adjudicator appointed at the request of either party by the [Insert details of nominating body, for example the Technology and Construction Solicitors‘

View the related q&as about I

In the context of understanding whether or not permission is needed to serve debt proceedings on a company based in Jersey where there is an express jurisdictional clause in the contract submitting to the English courts, could Regulation (EU) 1215/2012, Brussels I (recast) apply?

In the context of understanding whether or not permission is needed to serve debt proceedings on a company based in Jersey where there is an express jurisdictional clause in the contract submitting to the English courts, could Regulation (EU) 1215/2012, Brussels I (recast) apply? This Q&A considers the relevance of Regulation (EU) 1215/2012, Brussels I (recast) when considering whether permission is required to serve out of the jurisdiction. What is the relevance of Regulation (EU) 1215/2012 (Brussels I (recast)) when considering whether permission is required to serve out of the jurisdiction? Permission is not required to serve a claim form out of the jurisdiction where the factors in CPR 6.32 or CPR 6.33 are satisfied (note that CPR 6.32 is not relevant in this instance as it only applies to Scotland and Northern Ireland). CPR 6.33 sets out various scenarios where the permission of the court is not required to serve out of the UK. These include (at CPR 6.33(2)) reference to various provisions of Regulation (EU) 1215/2012 (Brussels I...

Where can I find information relating to FCA perimeter issues?

Where can I find information relating to FCA perimeter issues? The FCA's Perimeter Guidance manual (PERG) provides guidance about the circumstances in which authorisation is required, or exempt person status is available, including guidance on the activities which are regulated under the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 (the Act) and the exclusions which are available. Application of the Perimeter Guidance manual (PERG) PERG applies to: • a person who is considering carrying on activities in the United Kingdom which may fall within the scope of the Act and is seeking guidance on whether he/she needs to be an authorised person • a person who seeks to become an authorised person under the Act and who is, or is considering, applying for Part 4A permission to carry on regulated activities in the United Kingdom • a person who is seeking guidance on whether any communication he/she may be seeking to make or cause to be made will be a financial promotion and be subject to the restriction...

View the related News about I

Court finds compelling justification to continue injunctions to prevent dangerous car-cruising against persons unknown (Birmingham CC and Wolverhampton CC and others v Persons Unknown)

Local Government analysis: In continuing several local authority injunctions against named defendants and persons unknown for car-cruising and associated nuisance, Mr Justice Ritchie helpfully summarised the proper approach to whether such injunctions as against persons unknown should be continued on a review as prescribed by Wolverhampton City Council & others v London Gypsies and Travellers and others (‘the Wolverhampton case’). The case assimilates the numerous factors to which the court must have regard (and which the parties ought to address in evidence and submissions) by reference to the decisions in Valero Energy Ltd v Persons Unknown, the Wolverhampton case and MBR Acres Ltd and others v McGivern. Written by Stephanie Smith, barrister at 4-5 Gray’s Inn Square.

SFO’s growth push a ‘difficult line to tread’ for prosecutor

Law360, London: The Serious Fraud Office’s (SFO) recent promise to assist UK Plc with growth has raised eyebrows among former officials who question the optics of adopting political talking points that, on the surface, appear to distract from investigating and prosecuting economic crime.