556. Judicial warnings in respect of suspect evidence.
Criminal Procedure (Volume 27 (2021), paras 1–442; Volume 28 (2021), paras 443–938) | Commentary
It is no longer obligatory for a judge to direct the jury that it is dangerous to convict a defendant on the uncorroborated evidence of a complainant in a sexual case or of an accomplice1; but in some cases (not necessarily cases involving sexual offences or accomplice evidence) a judge may still consider that some kind of warning is necessary2.
To view the latest version of this document and millions of others like it, sign-in to LexisNexis or register for a free trial.
It is no longer obligatory for a judge to direct the jury that it is dangerous to convict a defendant on the uncorroborated evidence of a complainant in a sexual case or of an accomplice1; but in some cases (not necessarily cases involving sexual offences or accomplice evidence) a judge may still consider that some kind of warning is necessary2.
To view this document in full, take a free 7 day trial of LexisNexis and benefit from:
- Access to 20 million legal documents from over 1,600 Sources as part of our archive
- The ability to download court judgments within 30 minutes of their release
- New enactments available within 24 hours of publication on legislation.gov.uk
- Exclusive Sources to LexisNexis include; Halsbury’s Laws, Atkin’s Court Forms, Encyclopedia of Forms and Precedents and the All England Law Reports
Continue reading
To continue reading Halsbury's Laws of England, register for a free Lexis+ trial.