191. Construction against exclusion of liability for negligence.
Contract (Volume 22 (2019)) | Commentary
Where a contracting party would prima facie be liable for negligence, but seeks to protect himself by relying upon a provision of the contract, then, following the usual rule, the provision will be read contra proferentem1. Thus, where he may be subject to liability for negligence and to a stricter form of liability2 the position is that general words of exclusion will not ordinarily protect him from liability for negligence3, but will prima
To view the latest version of this document and millions of others like it, sign-in to LexisNexis or register for a free trial.
Where a contracting party would prima facie be liable for negligence, but seeks to protect himself by relying upon a provision of the contract, then, following the usual rule, the provision will be read contra proferentem1. Thus, where he may be subject to liability for negligence and to a stricter form of liability2 the position is that general words of exclusion will not ordinarily protect him from liability for negligence3, but will prima
To view this document in full, take a free 7 day trial of LexisNexis and benefit from:
- Access to 20 million legal documents from over 1,600 Sources as part of our archive
- The ability to download court judgments within 30 minutes of their release
- New enactments available within 24 hours of publication on legislation.gov.uk
- Exclusive Sources to LexisNexis include; Halsbury’s Laws, Atkin’s Court Forms, Encyclopedia of Forms and Precedents and the All England Law Reports
Continue reading
To continue reading Halsbury's Laws of England, register for a free Lexis+ trial.