Excepted perils in a charterparty1 presumptively do not protect the shipowner where the peril which causes the loss is attributable to the negligence of his employees: as a result it is not unusual for the charterparty to contain a negligence clause extending the scope of the exceptions to such negligence2.
A clause in a charterparty exempting a shipowner from liability for negligence is valid and enforceable3, provided that it is clear and unambiguous in its terms4. In the past there was a practice of construing such clauses strictly against the shipowner5, and holding them inapplicable unless they specifically referred to
**Trials are provided to all LexisPSL and LexisLibrary content, excluding Practice Compliance, Practice Management and Risk and Compliance, subscription packages are tailored to your specific needs. To discuss trialling these LexisPSL services please email customer service via our online form. Free trials are only available to individuals based in the UK. We may terminate this trial at any time or decide not to give a trial, for any reason. Trial includes one question to LexisAsk during the length of the trial.
To view the latest version of this document and millions of others like it, sign-in to LexisLibrary or register for a free trial.
EXISTING USER? SIGN IN
TAKE A FREE TRIAL
0330 161 1234