A unilateral mistake arises in contract law where only one party is mistaken about a fundamental term or assumption, such as the identity of the other party, the nature of the contract, or a key price or quantity, and the other party knows or is taken to know of that mistake. It is not generally defined in legislation, but developed through case law across England and Wales, Scotland, Northern Ireland and Ireland, with broadly similar principles.Unilateral mistake may render a contract void or voidable in narrow circumstances, particularly where there is a “mistake as to terms” evident from the written agreement, or mistaken identity in face‑to‑face or distance transactions. Common examples include mis‑priced tenders, erroneous bids at auction, and mis-signed deeds.Courts distinguish unilateral mistake from common or mutual mistake and are slow to grant relief where the error is merely about commercial value or arises from a party’s own negligence. Remedies include rescission, rectification (where the written document fails to reflect the agreed terms), or refusal of specific performance. In practice, unilateral mistake is often raised in disputes over contract formation, enforceability, and mis-signed documents, and in negotiations on allocation of risk through entire agreement, non-reliance and exclusion clauses.