Arbitration analysis: The Superior Court of Justice of Lima (Corte Superior de Justicia de Lima) annulled the arbitral award between Ingram Micro SAC and the Public Ministry, citing motivación aparente (apparent reasoning) in the arbitrator's decision. In the 2020 dispute over computer equipment delivery delays due to the pandemic, the Ministry terminated the contract and imposed penalties. The arbitral tribunal sided with Ingram Micro, rejecting the contract termination and penalties. However, the court's decision underscores the need for coherent and well-founded reasoning in arbitral awards. It highlights the delicate balance between arbitration autonomy and judicial oversight, emphasizing the importance of avoiding apparent reasoning. This case sets a precedent for arbitration in Peru, urging parties to provide thorough justifications to mitigate the risk of annulment based on perceived lack of substance in the arbitral decision Written by Seguimundo Navarro, partner at inARB | Arbitrator | MCIArb | ArbP | LLM, Spain.