Access this content for free with a 7 day trial of LexisNexis and benefit from:
- Instant clarification on points of law
- Smart search
- Workflow tools
- 42 practice areas
"Everything at Advocates is done on a timed basis, so we need to conduct our research efficiently. We don't want to charge clients unnecessarily or write off our time. With Lexis products, we can get more research done each day"
Advocates
Access all documents on Refusal to supply/license
GET ACCESS NOWA dominant firm's refusal to supply products, provide access or to license its intellectual property rights to other firms (sometimes including its competitors) may amount to an abuse of a dominant position, particularly where the refusal amounts to a foreclosure of a downstream market.
Compulsory dealing is an exception to the general freedom of contract principle that operates in market economies, but is viewed as necessary in some instances in order to preserve competition and prevent anti-competitive effects. In limited circumstances a refusal to supply/license, coupled with the absence of objective justification, can amount to a breach of Article 102 TFEU and/or the Competition Act 1998, s 18.
Speed up all aspects of your legal work with tools that help you to work faster and smarter. Win cases, close deals and grow your business–all whilst saving time and reducing risk.