Rely on the most comprehensive, up-to-date legal content designed and curated by lawyers for lawyers
Work faster and smarter to improve your drafting productivity without increasing risk
Accelerate the creation and use of high quality and trusted legal documents and forms
Streamline how you manage your legal business with proven tools and processes
Manage risk and compliance in your organisation to reduce your risk profile
Stay up to date and informed with insights from our trusted experts, news and information sources
Access the best content in the industry, effortlessly — confident that your news is trustworthy and up to date.
With over 30 practice areas, we have all bases covered. Find out how we can help
Our trusted tax intelligence solutions, highly-regarded exam training and education materials help guide and tutor Tax professionals
Regulatory, business information and analytics solutions that help professionals make better decisions
A leading provider of software platforms for professional services firms
In-depth analysis, commentary and practical information to help you protect your business
LexisNexis Blogs shed light on topics affecting the legal profession and the issues you're facing
Legal professionals trust us to help navigate change. Find out how we help ensure they exceed expectations
Lex Chat is a LexisNexis current affairs podcast sharing insights on topics for the legal profession
Discuss the latest legal developments, ask questions, and share best practice with other LexisPSL subscribers
Before a right of light claim can be brought, it is necessary to check that:
If a right of light does exist, a landowner can prevent someone interfering with that light.
Seek specialist surveyor's advice to ensure the right of light exists and has been infringed.
It is not enough that there is less light than before as there must be substantial deprivation of light that prevents the owner from carrying on his business as he did before the light obstruction. There is no fixed test, but a technical methodology developed by Percy Waldram (known as the 'Waldram test') has formed the basis of expert evidence given in rights of light cases since the early 1900s (such as in Colls). Whilst this has been criticised by the courts it is still widely used.
References: Colls v Home & Colonial Stores [1904-07] All ER Rep 5
Along with evidence of lay persons, the overriding consideration is still whether there is substantial deprivation of light according to 'the ordinary notions of mankind'.
References: Carr-Saunders v Dick McNeill Associates  2 All ER 888
If a right exists, there are two ways that an infringement of a right of light can be resolved:
Consent and compensation
This is the most common way of resolving a right of light claim.
If a developer is considering building, or has commenced building, negotiations should be started--the interference may be capable of being exchanged for monetary compensation or some other benefit.
The terms of any settlement agreement must be recorded in a deed. The deed should then be registered with the Land Registry using Form AP1.
A property owner whose light will be interfered with (or has already been interfered with) may apply for an injunction. This may be:
References: Shelfer v City of London Electric Lighting Company [1891-94] All ER Rep 838
If successful the court can order that the development be demolished or cut back to prevent the interference with the right of light. The court also has a discretion to award dam
Access this article and thousands of others like it free by subscribing to our blog.
Read full article
Already a subscriber? Login
0330 161 1234