Rely on the most comprehensive, up-to-date legal content designed and curated by lawyers for lawyers
Work faster and smarter to improve your drafting productivity without increasing risk
Accelerate the creation and use of high quality and trusted legal documents and forms
Streamline how you manage your legal business with proven tools and processes
Manage risk and compliance in your organisation to reduce your risk profile
Stay up to date and informed with insights from our trusted experts, news and information sources
Access the best content in the industry, effortlessly — confident that your news is trustworthy and up to date.
With over 30 practice areas, we have all bases covered. Find out how we can help
Our trusted tax intelligence solutions, highly-regarded exam training and education materials help guide and tutor Tax professionals
Regulatory, business information and analytics solutions that help professionals make better decisions
A leading provider of software platforms for professional services firms
In-depth analysis, commentary and practical information to help you protect your business
LexisNexis Blogs shed light on topics affecting the legal profession and the issues you're facing
Legal professionals trust us to help navigate change. Find out how we help ensure they exceed expectations
Lex Chat is a LexisNexis current affairs podcast sharing insights on topics for the legal profession
Printer Friendly Version
Corporate analysis: Will we see an increase in the number of M&A/IPO dual-track processes in 2015? George Swan, a corporate partner at Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer LLP, gives an overview of what is involved in the process and the benefits and pitfalls practitioners should consider.
A dual-track involves running an M&A sale track alongside an IPO track, so the owner company only has to make a final decision on its preferred exit strategy late in the process.
It is sometimes run simultaneously with a third refinancing track, for example through a high yield bond—this is referred to as a triple-track process.
Potential benefits include:
The key challenges are that:
In many ways, 2014 has seen the dual-track become the preferred exit strategy, especially for private equity exits.
Geographically, dual-tracks are popular in London and New York. They have also been seen in Japan but are less common elsewhere in Asia, where strong capital markets have traditionally provided better returns via IPOs than M&A exits. They are sometimes seen on bigger deals in parts of Europe, but regulatory constraints make dual-tracks challenging to implement in France.
This is potentially a much longer process, including regulatory reviews of IPO documentation, so it will usually require more practitioner hours and more input from practitioners’ specialist teams.
It is market practice to use different banks and advisers for each track, so the relationships with third party advisers will be more complicated.
The public disclosure requirements for IPOs mean that it is essential to monitor the extent of the M&A track disclosure closely and be prepared for short notice disclosures. It may also be necessary to put standstill agreements in place with bidders.
The IPO track means that it may be possible to substitute the prospectus and financial long-form reports for legal and financial vendor due diligence, although usually on a modified or non-reliance basis.
Representations and warranties
The dual-track requires fairly extensive business warranties in the underwriting agreement as there is no post-closing recourse to the owner company on an IPO. The M&A track may use modified underwriting agreement warranties with the draft prospectus as its disclosure letter.
Mitigating volatility in the equity markets
Equity markets in 2014 have seen a lot of volatility. When market conditions change suddenly, this can adversely impact an IPO’s execution and/or pricing. There were numerous examples in the UK in 2014 of IPOs being pulled. Given this volatility, and the subsequent uncertainty over timing, we anticipate that dual-track processes will gain momentum more widely in 2015 for businesses that historically would have focused solely on an IPO.
Responding to the more selective needs of investors
Investors were more selective in the second half of 2014. In response to factors such as mixed after-market trading performance by a number of companies listed in 2014, some aborted IPOs, macro-economic events and investors’ own need to manage new portfolios. The competitive tension created through a dual-track process can mitigate some of the effects of this to support higher exit pricing.
In 2014 we saw a significant number of exits supported by a separate, often informal, sale process. The majority of dual track processes by value ended in IPOs.
We will continue to see dual-track processes being used in 2015, with an increasing percentage of deals beginning as IPO/M&A dual-track processes, both by number and by value.
George Swan is a financial services partner specialising in domestic and cross-border mergers and acquisitions, joint ventures and other corporate advisory and transactional work with a particular focus on the insurance and banking sectors.
Interviewed by Jenisa Altink-Thumbadoo.
The views expressed by our Legal Analysis interviewees are not necessarily those of the proprietor.
First published on Lexis®PSL Corporate. For a free trial click here.
0330 161 1234