Andrew Wilson#4931

Andrew Wilson

Consultant Solicitor
Andrew has more than 25 years’ experience of working in the fields of personal injury and occupational disease litigation, acting for both claimants and defendants. He trained at L Bingham & Co, gaining early experience in a number of important high profile claims involving the MIB. During the 1990s Andrew worked at Hextalls and then Kennedys, predominantly for defendants across a range of motor, employers’ liability and public liability matters many of which involved serious injuries or death. More recently, he has dealt with cases for claimants who have suffered serious injuries or occupational disease. He was a partner in a large specialist practice. He has provided seminars to solicitors and other legal professionals both for an external conference company and in house on the workings of the Civil Procedure Rules in the context of personal injury claims, amongst other subjects.

He has now set up his own legal consultancy, providing advice and support to solicitors, particularly a specialist London practice, in connection with fatal accidents and very serious injury cases such as brain injury, mostly in the High Court. He has continued to develop his education and training activities, providing seminars and contributing articles and commentaries to legal information services.

Since his training, Andrew has retained a particular interest in issues of motor indemnity and the operation of the Road Traffic Act and Article 75.
Contributed to

56

Introduction to interim payments in personal injury claims
Introduction to interim payments in personal injury claims
Practice Notes

This Practice Note gives general background on interim payments and considers entitlement in personal injury claims. It outlines the conditions for interim payments, one of which must be present before a court can make an order for an interim payment.

Jurisdiction in foreign accident claims
Jurisdiction in foreign accident claims
Practice Notes

This Practice Note identifies the main jurisdictional regimes which determine whether a claim can be brought in the courts of England and Wales including the Civil Jurisdiction and Judgments Act 1982 and English common law. An accident abroad will often have occurred during a package holiday which is regulated by the Package Travel and Linked Travel Arrangements Regulations 2018. Outside these regulations, the question of jurisdiction is more complicated. At common law, the jurisdiction of the court is based on the ability of the claimant to serve the proceedings either in the jurisdiction or outside the jurisdiction.

Low Velocity Impact RTAs—in detail
Low Velocity Impact RTAs—in detail
Practice Notes

This Practice Note covers Low Velocity Impact RTAs including factors taken into account by insurers, relevant case law and development of a standard procedure for dealing with these types of claims.

Nature and operation of vicarious liability
Nature and operation of vicarious liability
Practice Notes

This Practice Note outlines the nature of vicarious liability cases and in particular the relationship between employer and tortfeasor. Cases where the cause of the incident is the fault of either the employee or the employer are reviewed. Guidance on vicarious liability claims arising out of negligence or breach of statutory duty including the Protection from Harassment Act 1997 are also considered.

Occupational cancer
Occupational cancer
Practice Notes

This Practice Note is intended to deal with the legal principles which apply to claims of occupational cancer, focusing particularly on the issue of causation and the criteria the court will adopt in determining whether the claimant has discharged the burden of proof.

Occupiers' liability—contractors, builders and landlords
Occupiers' liability—contractors, builders and landlords
Practice Notes

This Practice Note deals with the liability issues which arise when premises are left in a dangerous state by independent contractors, builders and landlords. If an occupier employs an independent contractor, the occupier will not be liable if it can show that it acted reasonably in entrusting the work to an independent contractor and it had taken such steps (if any) as it reasonably ought to satisfy itself that the independent contractor was competent and the work had been properly done. Building contractors and subcontractors can be held liable if it can be shown that they had sufficient control over the premises to be an occupier and any faulty construction, maintenance or repair works they have undertaken on the premises caused the claimant’s accident. A landlord is not an occupier if they give the tenant control of the property. However, even where a landlord has given up effective control of the premises, it will usually retain control of any common parts (eg hallways, lifts etc in a building or flats) and will therefore be an occupier in respect of those.

Occupiers’ liability claims—lawful visitors
Occupiers’ liability claims—lawful visitors
Practice Notes

This Practice Note considers the duty of care which is owed by occupiers to lawful visitors under the Occupiers’ Liability Act 1957 to take reasonable care to ensure that lawful visitors will be reasonably safe when using the premises. It also looks at the control test to determine who is an occupier and the degree of care expected of children and skilled visitors.

Part 36 offers in personal injury claims—pre-6 April 2015 [Archived]
Part 36 offers in personal injury claims—pre-6 April 2015 [Archived]
Practice Notes

Archived: This Practice Note has been archived and is not maintained. This Practice Note sets out the pre–6 April 2015 CPR 36 provisions.

Part 36 offers in PI and clinical negligence claims
Part 36 offers in PI and clinical negligence claims
Practice Notes

This Practice Note provides guidance on the CPR 36 provisions and specifically considers the personal injury sections.

Periodical payments orders in personal injury claims
Periodical payments orders in personal injury claims
Practice Notes

This Practice Note considers the background and framework of periodical payment orders, when and why a periodical payment order might be made by the court and the factors a court will take into account.

Premises and lawful visitors in occupier’s liability claims
Premises and lawful visitors in occupier’s liability claims
Practice Notes

This Practice Note deals with what constitutes ‘premises’, when a potential claimant will be a ‘lawful visitor’ and rules relating to parkland and the countryside. Premises can be land or buildings as well as any fixed or moveable structure and can cover everything from shops, offices, public buildings, aircraft and houses. There are three types of lawful visitor: those with express permission, eg a person you invite into your house, those with implied permission, eg a person entering a shop and those with a right to enter, eg a police officer.

Procedure for applying for provisional damages
Procedure for applying for provisional damages
Practice Notes

This Practice Note outlines how to apply to the court for provisional damages and the requirement that a request for provisional damages must be formally pleaded in the particulars of claim. The Practice Note then considers the provisions of an order and the procedure for extending the time limit or applying for further damages.

Provisional damages
Provisional damages
Practice Notes

This Practice Note deals with the statutory framework and purpose of provisional damages awards. A provisional damages award will be ordered where there is a chance that, at some definite or indefinite time in the future, the claimant will develop a serious disease or suffer some serious deterioration in their physical or mental condition. The Practice Note considers the criteria test for chance and serious deterioration and outlines the relevant time frames for provisional damages awards.

Psychiatric injury—secondary victims
Psychiatric injury—secondary victims
Practice Notes

This Practice Note reviews the case law in relation to secondary victim claims, considering firstly the position following the case of Alcock v Chief Constable of Yorkshire Police prior to the Supreme Court judgment in the case of Paul v Royal Wolverhampton NHS Trust and secondly, the position following judgment in the latter case. Paul has clarified and extended the law, making a number of changes to the requirements for a claim to be brought by a secondary victim. This note therefore considers the criteria which secondary victims must satisfy to successfully obtain damages following an accident involving the primary victim. In addition, the Practice Note also provides a list of practical considerations to assist a practitioner in assessing the likelihood of success when bringing or defending a claim on behalf of/against a secondary victim.

Requirements for a personal injury periodical payments order
Requirements for a personal injury periodical payments order
Practice Notes

This Practice Note deals with the requirements for a periodical payments order: security, form of the order, and indexation. When considering whether to give an intention to the parties as to the appropriateness of a lump sum order or a periodical payments order or when considering whether to make a periodical payments order, the court will assess what best suits the claimant’s needs. CPR 41 lists the factors which should be taken into account. Before making a periodical payments order the court must be satisfied that the continuity of payments is reasonably secure.

Road accidents in the UK caused by foreign drivers—the Green Card system
Road accidents in the UK caused by foreign drivers—the Green Card system
Practice Notes

This Practice Note covers the legal framework and the procedure by which a claim is made by the victim of a road traffic accident which occurs in the UK but is caused by the driver of a foreign registered vehicle. It considers the changes introduced following the end of the Brexit transition or implementation period on 1 January 2021 including in relation to jurisdiction, service and the appointment of a claims correspondent in the UK.

Road traffic accidents in the EU—general principles
Road traffic accidents in the EU—general principles
Practice Notes

This Practice Note identifies the regulations and general principles that apply to road traffic accidents which have occurred in the European Union. Following IP completion day, a claimant pursuing a claim will be confronted by a number of issues.

Road traffic accidents in the EU—jurisdiction and applicable law
Road traffic accidents in the EU—jurisdiction and applicable law
Practice Notes

This Practice Note provides a guide to the main issues and challenges facing the practitioner when dealing with a claim arising from a road accident which occurred in the European Union. It is important for the practitioner to have an understanding of the changes to the relevant regulatory regimes brought about by the UK’s withdrawal from the EU and the impact on issues of jurisdiction and the applicable law.

Scope and impact of vicarious liability
Scope and impact of vicarious liability
Practice Notes

This Practice Note looks at the different types of relationships which may give rise to vicarious liability including between an employer and employee but also other relationships which are similar to employment. An employer’s potential liability is also explored in relation to incidents which occur outside working hours such as at social events and where an employee physically assaults another person.

Unauthorised visitors under the Occupiers’ Liability Act 1984—the duty of care
Unauthorised visitors under the Occupiers’ Liability Act 1984—the duty of care
Practice Notes

This Practice Note deals with unauthorised visitors and the duty of care an occupier owes to them under the Occupiers' Liability Act 1984. The Practice Note considers the definition of an ‘unauthorised visitor’ and the scope of an occupier’s duties towards them.

Practice Areas

Panels

  • Consulting Editorial Board
  • Contributing Author
  • Q&A Panel

If you expected to see yourself on this page, click here.