The following PI & Clinical Negligence practice note Produced in partnership with Andrew Wilson provides comprehensive and up to date legal information covering:
A primary victim is a claimant who was directly involved as a participant in the incident that caused their psychiatric injury. See Practice Note: Psychiatric injury—primary victims.
A secondary victim is one who suffers psychiatric injury not by being directly involved in the incident but by witnessing it and either:
seeing injury being sustained by a primary victim, or
fearing injury to a primary victim
See further Practice Note: Psychiatric injury—secondary victims—case tracker.
It is not sufficient, in the case of injury to a secondary victim, for the claimant to show that as a result of apprehending the infliction of physical injury or the risk of it to another person they have sustained nervous shock which caused psychiatric illness.
The courts have laid down strict control mechanisms with the aim of limiting numbers of what could possibly be a multiplicity of claims arising from a single tragic incident.
The control mechanisms can be viewed as setting out the requirements for the existence of a duty of care in ‘bystander’ cases and were described by Hoffmann LJ in Alcock v Chief Constable of Yorkshire Police. The claimant needs to prove:
a close tie of love and affection to the primary victim—see class of persons below
proximity to the event or its immediate aftermath (in time and space)—see proximity below
direct perception of the event or
**Trials are provided to all LexisPSL and LexisLibrary content, excluding Practice Compliance, Practice Management and Risk and Compliance, subscription packages are tailored to your specific needs. To discuss trialling these LexisPSL services please email customer service via our online form. Free trials are only available to individuals based in the UK. We may terminate this trial at any time or decide not to give a trial, for any reason. Trial includes one question to LexisAsk during the length of the trial.
To view the latest version of this document and thousands of others like it, sign-in to LexisPSL or register for a free trial.
Existing user? Sign-in
Take a free trial
This Practice Note considers the law governing the procedural law of arbitration proceedings (the curial law or lex arbitri) and how it is determined under the law of England and Wales (England and English are used as convenient shorthand).The procedural law of the arbitral proceedingsThe procedural
Express and implied contractual terms distinguishedContractual terms may be either express or implied:•express terms—are terms which are actually recorded in a written contract or openly expressed in an oral contract at the time the contract is made (or there may be a combination of written and oral
BREXIT: As of exit day (31 January 2020), the UK is no longer an EU Member State. However, in accordance with the Withdrawal Agreement, the UK has entered an implementation period, during which it continues to be subject to EU law. This has an impact on this Practice Note. For further guidance on
LiabilityFalse imprisonment consists of the complete deprivation of liberty without a lawful basis. Claims will in practice be made against a public body that exercises detention powers, usually a local police force, the Secretary of State for the Home Department or the Secretary of State for
0330 161 1234
To view our latest legal guidance content,sign-in to Lexis®PSL or register for a free trial.