The following Owner-Managed Businesses guidance note Produced by Tolley provides comprehensive and up to date tax information covering:
Increased penalties can be levied where a failure to notify, failure to file a return or an inaccuracy within a return involves an ‘offshore matter’ or ‘offshore transfer’. The maximum penalty under these rules is 200% of the tax at stake, with the specific penalty charged depending on the territory in which the income or gains arise. The categorisation of the territory depends on the transparency of the jurisdiction and the extent to which is shares information with HMRC, whether automatically or otherwise. See the Penalties for offshore matters and offshore transfers guidance note.
However, the Government felt that these rules did not sufficiently penalise taxpayers who moved their underlying assets from one territory in order to stay one step ahead of the international tax transparency agenda.
Following a consultation in 2014, legislation was introduced with effect from 27 March 2015 to introduce an additional penalty, on top of the penalty charged for the offshore matter, where the underlying assets had been moved or the taxpayer with beneficial ownership of the asset had changed his tax residence. The additional penalty is calculated as a percentage of the original penalty, rather than the tax at stake. The additional penalty is fixed at 50% of the original penalty; it cannot be reduced based on disclosure or help given to HMRC by the taxpayer.
To be charged an offshore asset move penalty:
the taxpayer must have been charged an ‘original penalty’ (see below)
the underlying behaviour which led to the original penalty must have been ‘deliberate’, whether or not it is also concealed (see below)
there must have been a ’relevant offshore asset move’ after the tax liability arose (known as the ‘relevant time’). Both of these terms are explained under ‘Meaning of relevant offshore asset move’ below)
the main reason, or one of the main reasons, behind the relevant offshore asset move is to prevent or delay HMRC from becoming aware of the UK tax
**Free trials are only available to individuals based in the UK. We may terminate this trial at any time or decide not to give a trial, for any reason.
Access this article and thousands of others like it free for 7 days with a trial of TolleyGuidance.
Read full article
Already a subscriber? Login
Terminal loss relief for trade losses in the final 12 monthsTrading losses incurred by a company in the final 12 months leading up to the discontinuance of trade may be carried back for up to three years from the period beginning immediately before that 12-month period. So if the final accounting
The basic rule is that all benefits provided to an employee by reason of their employment are taxable unless there is a specific exemption or other rule that means they are not chargeable to tax.ExemptionsThe main exemptions for employee benefits are in ITEPA 2003, ss 227–326B (Pt 4).Below is an
The rent-a-room scheme was introduced in the early 1990s to encourage homeowners to take in lodgers.Fundamentally, the rent-a-room scheme is a relief which means that the rent received by an individual from a lodger (up to a prescribed limit) can be exempt from income tax. If the gross rents are
This guidance note considers the capital gains tax implications where shares are sold in exchange for new shares.The consideration paid by a purchasing company to the shareholder(s) for their shares in a target company could be in the form of either:•new shares in the vendor in exchange for shares
To view our latest tax guidance content, sign in to Tolley Guidance or register for a free trial.