The following Owner-Managed Businesses guidance note Produced by Tolley in association with Philip Rutherford provides comprehensive and up to date tax information covering:
Under the penalty legislation introduced by FA 2007, Sch 24, where an inaccuracy has occurred on a return or other document which leads to an understatement of tax, the taxpayer is exposed to a penalty.
The rate of the penalty is based on the behaviour of the person and whether the disclosure of the error was prompted by HMRC. Once the rate has been calculated, this is then applied to the potential lost revenue (PLR), which is the extra tax due as a result of correcting the inaccuracy or under-assessment, in order to determine the amount of the penalty due.
The behaviour of the taxpayer is covered in more detail in the Calculating the penalty for inaccuracies in returns ― behaviour of the taxpayer guidance note. The PLR is discussed in the Calculating the penalty for inaccuracies ― potential lost revenue guidance note. The quality of the disclosure made to HMRC is covered in the Penalty reductions for inaccuracies guidance note.
The taxpayer can be held liable for an inaccuracy in return prepared by an agent.
However, the taxpayer is not liable to a penalty in relation to anything done or omitted by the agent if HMRC is satisfied that the taxpayer took reasonable care to avoid an inaccuracy. This would mean that the taxpayer would need evidence that reasonable care had been taken over the tax affairs. For a discussion of reasonable care, see the Reasonable care ― inaccuracies in returns guidance note.
Therefore, HMRC must be able to demonstrate that the taxpayer did not take reasonable care. If the taxpayer appointed an agent who was not competent to look after his affairs, this would not demonstrate reasonable care. An example might be where a taxpayer appointed a local accountant with no experience of international tax issues to look after a major corporate restructure because the agent was a friend of the Finance Director.
Another example would be
**Free trials are only available to individuals based in the UK. We may terminate this trial at any time or decide not to give a trial, for any reason.
Access this article and thousands of others like it free for 7 days with a trial of TolleyGuidance.
Read full article
Already a subscriber? Login
What is an Age 18–25 trust?The special category of Age 18–25 trusts was introduced by FA 2006 to offer some compensation for the loss of old style accumulation and maintenance (A&M) trusts. The A&M regime offered exemption from IHT charges on trusts in favour of children and young adults up to the
Generally speaking, inheritance tax (IHT) is charged only on transfers of value by individuals and trusts. However, to prevent avoidance of the tax, the charge is extended to participators in close companies where:•a close company makes a transfer of value, or•the share capital or loan capital of a
Tax professionals will often be asked to provide input into the financial statement work undertaken by audit professionals. This guidance note is intended to give an overview of some of the key issues when undertaking audit work.This note is an introduction only and is written on the assumption that
This guidance note provides an overview of the basic principles of inheritance tax, when it is charged and how it is calculated. It contains links and references to other parts of the module where more details can be found.Transfers of valueInheritance tax is based on the concept of a transfer of