Ardmore Group Limited

This Q&A considers whether a mandatory adjudication in a construction contract remains in place following termination.

This Q&A considers jurisdictional issues in respect of claim for personal injury brought by an airline crew member who was in-flight at the time of sustaining the personal injury.

This Q&A considers the circumstances where one of three individuals who own a freehold sells their share, and whether that would be caught by the right of first refusal under the Landlord and Tenant Act 1987.

This Q&A considers the circumstances in which HA 1988, Sch 2, Ground 2 can be relied upon as a ground for possession.

This Q&A considers the position in which the intention was to execute an Assured Shorthold Tenancy, but the signatures of the tenants have not been witnessed, and the landlord has not signed the agreement. In particular, it considers the process in terms of termination of the same.

This Q&A considers the legal position in circumstances where parties wish to agree an extension of an option which has expired.

This Q&A considers the ability of a claimant who lacks capacity to rely upon their own witness evidence in the context of civil proceedings.

This Q&A considers if in collective enfranchisement an intermediate landlord can increase the premium stated in the counter notice under LRHUDA 1993, s 21.

This Q&A considers the various remedies in respect of a right to light claim, and also whether or not planning permission is likely to be refused in circumstances the neighbouring property owners have consented to the project continuing, despite any interference with the right to light.

This Q&A deals with the time limits for commencing works after notice has been served as per section 20 of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985. It further considers the position if the freehold is sold to a new landlord after service of the notice.

This Q&A considers whether a lease is valid if there is a missing signature.

This Q&A considers whether or not a re-mortgage will be considered as a ‘disposition’ of land, and in particular, the position in respect of any other restrictions on the register.

This Q&A considers the time limit for a tenant to challenge a landlord’s notice to quit an Agricultural Holdings Act 1986 tenancy served under Case B.

This Q&A considers whether there is a rule or decided case which establishes that witness statements cannot introduce facts to prove matters that are not particularised in the statement of case.

This Q&A considers a tenant's claim to purchase a freehold house under the Leasehold Reform Act 1967, and in particular any time limit for applying for determination of their claim where the landlord has not served a response. It also considers whether there is an impact on the proposed premium.

This Q&A considers the circumstances in which a public authority can be held accountable for an omission.

This Q&A considers guidance on the interpretation of regulation 14(3) of the Regulatory Reform (Fire Safety) Order 2005, SI 2005/1541.

This Q&A considers the circumstances in which a landlord can serve a Schedule of Dilapidations on a tenant who, while having served a section 26 notice, has subsequently vacated the property.

This Q&A considers whether a 'yield up' clause puts specific responsibilities on the tenant for how they should return the property to the landlord.

This Q&A considers the timeframe for the collective enfranchisement procedure pursuant to LRHUDA 1993, s 13. In particular, it considers the timing of an application to the First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) to avoid the initial notice being deemed withdrawn.