Can Yeginsu

Barrister, 3 Verulam Buildings (3VB)

Can Yeginsu is a barrister and arbitrator practising from 3 Verulam Buildings in the areas of commercial and investment treaty arbitration, commercial litigation, civil liberties and human rights, as well as private and public international law.

In the field of international arbitration, Can has been described as “an outstanding advocate with a vast intellect and faultless judgement” (Chambers Global) “fiercely clever but also a true team player; he knows arbitration inside out” (UK Chambers), possessing “serious legal brainpower, accompanied with a deft touch with clients” (Legal 500), and “in a class of his own” (Chambers Global).

Can was awarded “International Arbitration Junior of the Year” by Legal 500 in 2023, having has been shortlisted in that category in 2019, and shortlisted for “Public International Law Junior of the Year” in 2022. In 2023, Can was also shortlisted for International Arbitration Junior of the Year by Chambers & Partners.

Can is Adjunct Professor of Law at Georgetown University Law Center and Koç University Law School, where he teaches investment law and arbitration. He is also Lecturer-in-Law at Columbia Law School where he teaches public international law and Partner Fellow at the Lauterpacht Centre for International Law, University of Cambridge.

Contributed to

1

Post-award remedies under the arbitration rules of major arbitral institutions and those of UNCITRAL

Practice Notes

This Practice Note considers the limited grounds on which a party to international arbitration proceedings may apply for (or request) the correction, review and interpretation of an award to either the arbitral tribunal (or arbitrators) or the arbitral institution under the institutional arbitration rules of the International Court of Arbitration of the International Chamber of Commerce (ICC), the London Court of International Arbitration (LCIA), Hong Kong International Arbitration Centre (HKIAC), Singapore International Arbitration Centre (SIAC), Dubai International Arbitration Centre (DIAC), International Centre for Dispute Resolution (ICDR), as well as the arbitration rules of the United Nations Commission on International Trade Law (UNCITRAL). This Practice Note also discusses whether parties to such arbitration rules can challenge or appeal arbitral awards to the tribunal or the institution (where relevant), concluding that such steps are generally only available before the courts of the seat of the arbitration. This Practice Note also discusses whether parties to such arbitration rules can challenge or appeal arbitral awards before tribunals or arbitral institutions (where relevant), concluding that such steps are generally only available before the courts of the seat of the arbitration. This topic may be referred to as: applying (applications) to the tribunal to reconsider awards; addressing typographical or computational errors in awards; remedies for inadequate awards in international institutional arbitration; applying for additional awards in institutional arbitration.

Arbitration