Aziz Rahman#6093

Aziz Rahman

Senior Partner, Rahman Ravelli
Aziz Rahman is Senior Partner at Rahman Ravelli; the firm he founded in 2001. The firm has been involved in some of the century’s most high-profile white-collar crime cases and major, high-stakes global commercial and financial disputes.

The firm regularly wins awards and secures successful outcomes in major cases that involve complex, cross-border or multi-jurisdictional issues, numerous enforcement agencies and significant funds. Aziz Rahman is highly ranked by legal guides and has been recognised as being among the very best when it comes to litigating in the most notable national and international high-value commercial and financial disputes and worldwide cross-border asset recovery cases.
Contributed to

2

Appointment of receivers in restraint proceedings
Appointment of receivers in restraint proceedings
Practice Notes

This Practice Note covers the appointment of management receivers in restraint proceedings under section 48 (2) of the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002 and the powers they can be given. It deals with the procedure for applying for management receivers and how to vary a management receivership order under the Criminal Procedure Rules 2020 (CrimPR 2020), SI 2020/759. It also deals with how to appeal against a decision to appoint or not to appoint a management receiver under the POCA 2002, s 65.

Conditions required before a restraint order can be made—checklist
Conditions required before a restraint order can be made—checklist
Checklists

This Checklist summarises the statutory conditions that must be met before a restraint order can be made under section 41 of the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002 (POCA 2002) including requirements for a criminal investigation to have begun or for proceedings for an offence to be underway before a restraint order can be granted. It covers the basis upon which a restraint order is made pre-conviction ie there being a reasonable cause for either suspicion or belief that the alleged offender has benefited (gained financially) from their criminal conduct, the impact of undue delay in continuing the proceedings on the chances of a restraint order being made and the application by the prosecutor for a restraint order based on an application to reconsider benefit or the available amount under POCA 2002, ss 21 or 22, or under POCA 2002, ss 19 and 20 (when fresh evidence arises during the confiscation stage or there is to be a redetermination), or under POCA 2002, s 27 or 28 (the defendant has absconded).

Practice Area

Panel

  • Contributing Author

Qualified Year

  • 1999

Qualification

  • 1996 LLB (Honours)

Education

  • 1997 College of Law, York

If you expected to see yourself on this page, click here.