Christopher Badger has an established practice in commercial regulatory investigations and prosecutions, specialising in environmental enforcement, acting for both corporate and individual defendants and on behalf of the Environment Agency. Recent instructions include: Advising in several significant commercial disputes in respect of environmental and health and safety obligations under EU and domestic law; judicial review proceedings challenging the implementation of the EU Emissions Trading Scheme; Walker & Son (Hauliers) Ltd v Environment Agency  1 Cr. App. R. 30;  Env L.R. 22 (leading authority on the statutory construction of “knowingly permit” in the Environmental Permitting Regulations 2007 and 2010); EA v WB Ltd (Counsel on behalf of 2 companies and their director in the largest prosecution for the illegal export of waste to date); R v Rogers, Beaman and Tapecrown Ltd  EWCA Crim 801 (leading authority on the admissibility of fresh evidence in appeals against sentence).
He is often asked to provide early stage advice into on-going investigations, both pre-interview and pre-charge, most recently for firms including Clyde & Co., Kingsley Napley, Eversheds, Kennedys and Osborne Clarke as well as the Environment Agency. Recent written advice and lectures have included issues on environmental liabilities for private investors, case law affecting the receipt of cash payments for the purposes of litigation and other topics including the definition of waste and confiscation in environmental prosecutions.
He is a contributor to the 2013 edition of Burnett Hall on Environmental Law and twice has been asked to speak at the Environment Agency’s National Conference. He was appointed to the ‘A’ List of Specialist Regulatory Counsel in June 2012.
This Practice Note explains the issues lawyers need to think about when advising a client following a waste offence, water offence, environmental permit offence, pollution or other environmental breach. It covers the need to prevent further environmental damage following an environmental incident, the duty to report the incident to environmental regulators such as the Environment Agency (EA) or local authority, the collection of evidence during the investigation, interaction with the investigating regulator including responding to EA investigations or other regulator investigations, and what to consider when conducting an internal investigation into an environmental breach such as the production of internal investigation reports into environmental offences.
This Practice Note explains the powers which the Environment Agency (EA) has to investigate and prosecute environmental crime in England. It covers powers under the Environment Act 1995, s 108 (section 108 powers), the application of the Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984 (PACE 1984), powers of entry, interviews under caution, compulsory interviews, power to obtain samples and documents as well as considering the offence of obstructing an officer.
This Practice Note explains the powers of Natural Resources Wales (NRW) to investigate and prosecute environmental crime in Wales. It covers the role and remit of NRW, powers under section 108 of the Environment Act 1995 (section 108 powers), the application of the Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984 (PACE 1984), powers of entry, interviews under caution, compulsory interviews as well as the criminal offence of obstructing an officer.
This Practice Note explains the approach the courts take when sentencing individuals found guilty of environmental crime and specifically breaches of section 33 of the Environmental Protection Act 1990 (EPA 1990) (unauthorised or harmful deposit, treatment or disposal of waste) and regulations 12 and 38 of the Environmental Permitting (England and Wales) Regulations (illegal discharges to air, water and land). It explains the requirements of the Sentencing Council’s sentencing guidelines for these offences, provides examples of sentences imposed for environmental breaches and outlines the approach to mitigation in environmental sentencing. It describes the 12 steps to sentencing an individual commencing with compensation, and covering also confiscation, determining the offence category, determining the appropriate starting point, ensuring that the combination of financial orders (compensation, confiscation if appropriate, and fine) removes any economic benefit derived from the offending, considering other factors that may warrant adjustment of the proposed fine and any other factors which indicate a reduction, such as assistance to the prosecution, making any reduction to reflect guilty pleas, considering ancillary orders, applying the totality principle, giving reasons and considering any time spent on bail. It also contains some illustrative sentences imposed on individuals using these environmental offences sentencing guidelines.
This Practice Note explains the approach the courts take when sentencing organisations found guilty of environmental crime and specifically breaches of section 33 of the Environmental Protection Act 1990 (EPA 1990) (unauthorised or harmful deposit, treatment or disposal of waste) and regulations 12 and 38 of the Environmental Permitting (England and Wales) Regulations (illegal discharges to air, water and land). It explains the requirements of the Sentencing Council’s sentencing guidelines for these offences, the factors which the court will consider on sentencing environmental breaches and the starting point for fines imposed on large corporate offenders. Mitigation features and aggravating features in environmental sentencing are covered as well as the ancillary orders which can also be made on conviction for environmental crimes are also highlighted.
If you expected to see yourself on this page, click here.
0330 161 1234