Daniel Hayes#6445

Daniel Hayes

I am a solicitor advocate, and my expertise is in immigration and public law, court processes and procedure. I have appeared in over 2500 court hearings as an advocate, and managed over 700 judicial reviews as a solicitor, gaining expertise over thirteen years. I have conducted significant and prolific cases in the Tribunals, the High Court and Court of Appeal. 

Key cases include: 
 
  • PK (Ghana), R (On the Application Of) v The Secretary of State for the Home Department [2018] EWCA Civ 98 on trafficking policy; 
  • Caroopen & Myrie v The Secretary of State for the Home Department [2016] EWCA Civ 1307 on the nature of supplementary decisions in judicial review claims 
  • Secretary of State for the Home Department v Shehzad & Anor [2016] EWCA Civ 615 – on the treatment of evidence at judicial review and the jurisdiction to appeal Tribunal decisions 
  • Mehmood & Anor, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2015] EWCA Civ 744 on the sequencing of decisions and the adequacy of alterantive remedies in judicial review 
  • Khanum & Others v Secretary of State for the Home Department (paragraph 353B) [2013] UKUT 311 
  • Seye (Chen children; employment) France [2013] UKUT 178 (IAC) (28 March 2013) 

 
In Planning:  
 
  • Old Sarum Airfield Ltd v Secretary of State for Housing Communities And Local Government [2020] EWHC 2112 on heritage harm and NPPF 196 
  • Granger-Taylor, R (on the application of) v High Speed Two (HS2) Ltd & Anor [2020] EWHC 1442 
  • Spitfire Bespoke Homes Ltd v Secretary of State for Housing Communities and Local Government [2020] EWHC 958 on the preservation of listed buildings and procedural fairness
Contributed to

2

Immigration judicial review: submitting a claim
Immigration judicial review: submitting a claim
Practice notes

This Practice Note outlines the procedural aspects of submitting an immigration judicial review claim and available remedies. It discusses which type of claims should be submitted to the Upper Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber), and which to the Administrative Court of the High Court. It also covers the procedural aspects of submitting a claim in both jurisdictions, including the Pre-Action Protocol including letter before claim, commencing and lodging a claim, service and acknowledgement of service, consent orders, the permission application, and substantive hearing. Further permission to appeal following an unsuccessful claim is also covered.

Immigration judicial review: which decisions can be reviewed and heads of review
Immigration judicial review: which decisions can be reviewed and heads of review
Practice notes

This Practice Note outlines the circumstances in which judicial review of immigration decisions is available, such as the requirement to have exhausted other remedies (including a discussion on where the alternative remedy for a person in the UK is an out-of-country appeal, exercisable only after departure). It also discusses the available grounds for judicial review, providing immigration-related case examples, and lists the remedies that may be granted to a successful claimant, including a discussion of damages.

Practice Area

Panel

  • Contributing Author

Qualified Year

  • 2006

Qualifications

  • Higher Rights (2016)
  • QLTT (2013)
  • Barrister (Non-practising) (2006)
  • LLB Law (2005)

Education

  • ICSL (2005-2006)
  • Brunel University (2001-2005)

If you expected to see yourself on this page, click here.