Eric Fripp#1610

Eric Fripp

Barrister, The 36 Group
Eric is a specialist adviser and advocate in public law and human rights cases including a substantial core of asylum, immigration, and nationality work.

Eric has built a substantial practice focusing on the international and domestic law concerned with refugees, nationality, and statelessness, United Kingdom immigration law, domestic human rights law as applicable to immigration and/or refugee cases, and administrative law/judicial review, with his experience extending to an increasing proportion of complex and/or politically sensitive cases in all of those areas.
In recent years he has also attracted broader public law and human rights work on behalf of interveners in important non-immigration related cases concerning private and family life under article 8 ECHR, the right to marry under article 12 ECHR, and freedom of thought, conscience and religion under article 9 ECHR. He is noted for his thoroughness and skill as an advocate in the higher courts and for the breadth of his complementary supporting interests in relevant areas of public international law, legal and political philosophy, and history.
Contributed to

5

Article 8 claims since 9 July 2012—the Secretary of State’s approach
Article 8 claims since 9 July 2012—the Secretary of State’s approach
Practice notes

Since 9 July 2012 the Secretary of State for the Home Department has adopted a new approach to the assessment of Article 8 of European Convention on Human Rights immigration claims, formulating Immigration Rules which purport to define the circumstances under which an Article 8 family or private life claim will, or will not, succeed under the Rules. In parallel, Parliament has amended the Nationality, Immigration and Asylum Act 2002 (NIAA 2002) by addition of a new Part 5A. This incorporates into statute the considerations which a court or tribunal must have regard to when considering whether a decision under the Immigration Acts which interferes with private and/or family life is justified under Article 8(2). This Practice Note considers the effects of the post-July 2012 developments on assessment of Article 8 claims.

Article 8 immigration claims
Article 8 immigration claims
Practice notes

This Practice Note summarises the background to Article 8 claims under the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR) in the immigration context, including how the ECHR is incorporated into UK law, and provides links to the series of Practice Notes on Lexis®PSL Immigration which consider the area in detail.

Article 8 in the immigration context
Article 8 in the immigration context
Practice notes

This Practice Note provides a detailed description of the scope of Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR), and the protections it gives in the immigration context. It covers which rights are protected, ie family life (spouse, parent-child, inter sibling and other relationships, and the relevance of the best interests of the child) and private life, and how the right is qualified (including a summary of the Razgar test on Article 8 assessment). The Practice Note also gives a summary of the European Court of Human Rights decision in Jeunesse v the Netherlands, which is a recent examination of the applicable principles which has been influential in recent Supreme Court decisions, and looks at the important concepts of ‘insurmountable obstacles’, ‘precariousness’ and ‘exceptional circumstances’.

Entering into marriage and civil partnership in England and Wales as a non-EEA national
Entering into marriage and civil partnership in England and Wales as a non-EEA national
Practice notes

This Practice Note looks at the relevant procedures for a non-EEA national entering into marriage or civil partnership in England and Wales following entry into force of relevant sections of the Immigration Act 2014.

Navigating an Article 8 claim
Navigating an Article 8 claim
Practice notes

This Practice Note provides advisers with practical guidance on how to approach an Article 8 claim. It looks at adjudication and evidence, and also draws out five types of Article 8 cases and summarises how a claim should be assessed in each of them. These fall under two separate headings, depending on whether they are a ‘complete code’ case or not.

Practice Area

Panel

  • Contributing Author

Membership

  • Associate Member of the European Network on Statelessness
  • Royal Institute of International Affairs
  • JUSTICE
  • Immigration Law Practitioners Association
  • Human Rights Lawyers Association
  • UK Constitutional Law Association
  • Constitutional and Administrative Bar Association
  • British Institute of International and Comparative Law

Qualifications

  • LLM (Jurisprudence)
  • MA (Medical Law and Ethics)
  • LLM (Human Rights/Public International Law)
  • MA (History)

Education

  • University of London (London School of Economics)
  • University of London (Kings College London)
  • University of St. Andrews
  • University of London

If you expected to see yourself on this page, click here.