Kate Longson#15088

Kate Longson

Barrister, Ropewalk Chambers
Kate enjoys a fast-paced practice focussed on personal injury, clinical negligence and disease litigation along with associated inquests. Described as an “outstanding advocate” with “excellent attention to detail” she is ranked as a leading junior by the Legal 500 and Chambers and Partners.

Kate has a particularly keen interest in cases involving animals and is ranked Band 1 by Chambers and Partners in this specialist area. She is regularly instructed in a broad range of claims involving injuries caused by livestock, equestrian accidents and dog attacks. With a background in sheep and dairy farming, and as a lifelong dog owner and a horse owner of over 20 years, Kate is able to provide invaluable insight in Animals’ Act claims and is regularly called upon to represent both Claimants and Defendants in difficult; high value claims.
Contributed to

1

Personal injury claims in the agricultural sector
Personal injury claims in the agricultural sector
Practice Notes

OverviewClaims for personal injuries which have occurred in an agricultural setting are likely to give rise to many of the same issues that practitioners will see on a day-to-day basis in other areas of work. This Practice Note will seek to assist with some of the more unusual issues which may arise in an agricultural context.Employers’ liability in agriculture‘Agriculture is the most healthful, most useful, and most noble employment of man.’George WashingtonThere is undoubtedly much joy to be derived from time spent in the British countryside. However, ‘healthful’ though agricultural work may be for many, the presence of machinery, livestock, chemicals, slurry pits and a plethora of other hazards means that work in the agricultural sector is fraught with risk.The general principles associated with employers’ liability claims will apply equally in an agricultural context and for further guidance see: Employer’s liability—overview.The starting point in any employer’s liability claim is to establish that the claimant was indeed employed by the defendant. By its very

Practice Area

Panel

  • Contributing Author

If you expected to see yourself on this page, click here.