Laura Heeley#13920

Laura Heeley

Solicitor – Principal Associate PSL, Eversheds Sutherland
A Principal Associate PSL for the Commercial Dispute Resolution team at Eversheds Sutherland International. Laura advises on key legal developments and the application of legal principles to complex disputes including cross border considerations. Before becoming a Professional Support Lawyer, Laura spent over ten years in practice in the Commercial Litigation team at Wright Hassall. Laura has advised on a wide range of commercial and corporate disputes including contractual, tortious, director and shareholder, partnership and regulatory disputes.  Laura is also a Solicitor Advocate with Higher Rights of Audience in Civil Advocacy.  

In the sports sector Laura has advised sports national governing bodies (NGBs) in respect of contractual, disciplinary, and regulatory disputes, governance and compliance, safeguarding issues and tribunal hearings including appeals to Sports Resolution and the Court of Arbitration for Sport. Laura now also sits on the panel of Arbitrators for Sport Resolutions.
 

Contributed to

8

Determining legal practitioners’ disclosure duties
Determining legal practitioners’ disclosure duties
Practice Notes

This Practice Note sets out the disclosure obligations of legal practitioners when involved in civil proceedings. For general guidance on disclosure, see: Disclosure—overview.Note: this Practice Note does not intend to cover the claims that are subject to the Disclosure Scheme in the Business and Property Courts. For further guidance on this, see: Disclosure Scheme (Business & Property Courts)—overview.For guidance on disclosure duties for parties, see Practice Note: Disclosure—parties' duties.Disclosure rules and obligationsDisclosure rules can vary according to the track to which a claim is allocated. For general guidance on allocations, see: Allocating and transferring proceedings—overview.For general guidance on disclosure in:•small claims track—see Practice Note: Disclosure in the small claims track•fast-track claims—see Practice Note: Disclosure in fast track cases•intermediate track claims—see Practice Note: Disclosure in intermediate track cases•multi track claims—see Practice Note: Disclosure in multi track casesDisclosure obligations for legal practitionersThroughout the disclosure process, legal practitioners have obligations to their

Disclosure in fast track cases
Disclosure in fast track cases
Practice Notes

IntroductionThis Practice Note sets out the disclosure requirements for claims allocated to the fast track, including the rules and guidance applicable where the claim form was issued on or after 1 October 2023 (excluding personal injury and clinical negligence cases where different timing rules apply). For general guidance on disclosure, see: Disclosure—overview.Note: This Practice Note does not intend to cover the claims that are subject to the Disclosure Scheme in the Business and Property Courts. For more guidance on the disclosure scheme, see: Disclosure Scheme (Business & Property Courts)—overview.For general guidance on the disclosure process in relation to the other tracks, see Practice Notes:•Disclosure in the small claims track•Disclosure in intermediate track cases•Disclosure in multi-track casesThe scope of a fast track claimThe fast track was designed to provide a streamlined procedure for managing and bringing lower value claims above the small claims limit, to trial in the county court. The aim is to keep

Disclosure in intermediate track cases
Disclosure in intermediate track cases
Practice Notes

IntroductionThis Practice Note sets out the disclosure requirements for claims allocated to the intermediate track, including the rules and guidance applicable where the claim form was issued on or after 1 October 2023.Note: This Practice Note does not intend to cover the claims that are subject to the Disclosure Scheme in the Business and Property Courts. For general guidance on the Disclosure Scheme, see: Disclosure Scheme (Business & Property Courts)—overview.For general guidance on the disclosure process in relation to the other tracks, see Practice Notes:•Disclosure in the small claims track•Disclosure in fast track cases•Disclosure in multi-track casesThe scope of a claim in the intermediate trackThe intermediate track claim was introduced from 1 October 2023 for cases that are more complex than those suitable for the fast track, but not as complex as those requiring multi-track case management.These claims range between £25,000 and £100,000 and are not overly complex and can be resolved within

Disclosure in multi-track cases
Disclosure in multi-track cases
Practice Notes

IntroductionThis Practice Note sets out the disclosure requirements for claims allocated to the multi-track. It also provides guidance on the interpretation and application of the relevant provisions of the Civil Procedure Rules (CPR) and should be read in conjunction with: Disclosure under CPR 31—pre-action considerations—checklist and Disclosure considerations under CPR 31 after proceedings have started—checklist.For general guidance on disclosure, see: Disclosure—overview.Note: This Practice Note does not intend to cover the claims that are subject to the Disclosure Scheme in the Business and Property Courts. For general guidance on the Disclosure Scheme, see: Disclosure Scheme (Business & Property Courts)—overview.For general guidance on the disclosure process in relation to the other tracks, see Practice Notes:•Disclosure in the small claims track•Disclosure in fast track cases•Disclosure in intermediate track casesThe scope of a claim in the multi-trackThe multi-track is designed for more complex cases, involving intricate legal or factual issues that require extensive case management. The court provides

Disclosure in the small claims track
Disclosure in the small claims track
Practice Notes

This Practice Note sets out the disclosure requirements for all claims that are allocated to the small claims track. For general guidance on disclosure, see: Disclosure—overview.Note: this Practice Note does not intend to cover the claims that are subject to the Disclosure Scheme in the Business and Property Courts. For further guidance on the Disclosure Scheme, see: Disclosure Scheme (Business & Property Courts)—overview.For general guidance on the disclosure process in relation to the other tracks, see Practice Notes:•Disclosure in fast track cases•Disclosure in intermediate track cases•Disclosure in multi-track casesThe scope of a claim in the small claims trackClaims on the small claims track are known as ‘small claims’. The small claims track is specific for claims for under £10,000.For more guidance on cases allocated to and proceeding on the small claims track, see Practice Note: Small claims track—case management.Disclosure in the small claims trackClaims under the small claims track are governed

Disclosure under CPR 31—introduction
Disclosure under CPR 31—introduction
Practice Notes

This Practice Note provides an introduction to disclosure under the Civil Procedure Rules (CPR), setting out the main CPR provisions governing the disclosure process under CPR 31. It considers the meaning under the CPR of a document and provides practical tips on conducting a disclosure exercise.Note: this Practice Note does not intend to cover the claims that are subject to the Disclosure Scheme in the Business and Property Courts. For further guidance on the Disclosure Scheme, see: Disclosure Scheme (Business & Property Courts)—overview. For guidance on which disclosure rules apply to your claim, see: Which disclosure rules apply to my claim—flowchart?This Practice Note should be read in conjunction with:•Disclosure—overview•Inspection—overview, and•Privilege and without prejudice communications—overviewAt a pre-action stage, you also need to be aware that some of the pre-action protocols set out requirements for disclosure before proceedings have started. For further guidance, see: Pre-action disclosure and Norwich Pharmacal—overview.CPR provisions governing the disclosure processThe CPR and case

Failure to comply with disclosure obligations
Failure to comply with disclosure obligations
Practice Notes

This Practice Note sets out the consequences that can apply for failure to comply with a party’s or legal practitioner’s disclosure obligations. For guidance on the commonly encountered issues, see Practice Note: Failure to comply with disclosure obligations—commonly encountered issues.Note: this Practice Note does not consider any specific consequences as a result of failing to comply with CPR PD 57AD. For general guidance on the Disclosure Scheme, see: Disclosure Scheme (Business & Property Courts)—overview. Note: not all claims proceeding in the Business and Property Courts are subject to the Disclosure Scheme under CPR PD 57AD—for further guidance, see: Which disclosure rules apply to my claim—flowchart?CPR 31.21 provides that a party who fails to disclose or permit inspection of a document may not rely on that document without the court's permission to do so.There are also various case management powers available to the court which may be used where a party is in default of a rule, practice direction or court order. These

Failure to comply with disclosure obligations—commonly encountered issues
Failure to comply with disclosure obligations—commonly encountered issues
Practice Notes

This Practice Note sets out the commonly encountered issues as a result of a failure to comply with disclosure obligations. .It does not consider any specific consequences as a result of failing to comply with CPR PD 57AD. For general guidance on the Disclosure Scheme, see: Disclosure Scheme (Business & Property Courts)—overview. Note, not all claims proceeding in the Business and Property Courts are subject to the Disclosure Scheme under CPR PD 57AD—for further guidance, see: Which disclosure rules apply to my claim—flowchart?Can a trial be adjourned because disclosure has not been completed?The court has the power to adjourn a hearing under CPR 3.1(2)(b) and also following a party’s application under CPR 29.5(1)(d) in a multi-track case. A failure to complete disclosure may be a ground for such an application, but it does not automatically follow that the trial will be adjourned in those circumstances.In Geoquip Marine Operations AG v Tower Resources Cameroon SA, the defendant argued at the start of

Practice Area

Panel

  • Contributing Author

Qualified Year

  • 2008

If you expected to see yourself on this page, click here.