Shomik Datta#11222

Shomik Datta

Shomik is a Property and Commercial litigator with over 20 years of experience.

He has been rated as a leading junior in all aspects of property litigation (including landlord and tenant disputes, whether commercial or residential) for many years. 

He has developed a particular expertise in interpretation disputes and the intersection of equitable doctrines such as (all species of) estoppel and waiver with various forms of property dispute.

Recent examples of his work include:
(a) Rail For London v LB Hackney [2022] EWHC 2929 (Ch), a £200m dispute as to the interpretation of rent provisions within a leaseback scheme ancillary to an infrastructure development, with ancillary estoppel by convention issues.
(b) Dell v 89 Holland Park Management Ltd [2022] UKUT 169 (LC), the single largest service charge dispute, relating to the recoverability of legal costs incurred in litigation with third parties. Appeal to the CA pending.
(c) Merthyr (South Wales) Lts v Merthyr Tydfil CBC [2019] EWCA Civ 526, a dispute arising from the enforcement of a £15m escrow fund agreement to secure remediation works from Europe’ largest open cast mine. Of note by the reaffirmation of the exclusionary effect of the parol evidence rule extending to pre-contractual documents that might evidence the genesis and object of later written provisions.

Contributed to

5

If the landlord has provided the tenant with the prescribed information certificate relating to a tenancy
If the landlord has provided the tenant with the prescribed information certificate relating to a tenancy
Q&A

This Q&A considers the obligations a landlord has with regard to a prescribed information certificate relating to a tenancy deposit when it has been counter-signed by the tenant.

Taking into account section 42(2)(c) of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954, does an inter-group assignment
Taking into account section 42(2)(c) of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954, does an inter-group assignment
Q&A

This Q&A considers whether an inter-group assignment requires a formal ‘licence to assign’ from the landlord.

We are acting for a buyer on a purchase of commercial property. A couple of retails units have been let
We are acting for a buyer on a purchase of commercial property. A couple of retails units have been let
Q&A

This Q&A considers whether express tenancies at will in a commercial property can later be interpreted as protected periodic tenancies by virtue of the parties conduct.

What options are there for share of freehold owners when one co-freeholder is refusing to sign off on
What options are there for share of freehold owners when one co-freeholder is refusing to sign off on
Q&A

This Q&A considers the options for a share of freehold owners when one co-freeholder refuses to sign off on structurally required major works or routine maintenance.

Where financial proceedings have been issued in Form A, is the applicant compelled to serve the issued
Where financial proceedings have been issued in Form A, is the applicant compelled to serve the issued
Q&A

This Q&A considers whether the applicant is compelled to serve an issued Form A on a respondent who is in Cyprus or whether the court can do so.

Practice Areas

Panel

  • Q&A Panel

Qualified Year

  • 2000

Experience

  • 22 Old Buildings (2000 - 2007)
  • 42 Bedford Row (2007 - 2013)
  • Cornerstone Barristers (2013 - Present)

Membership

  • Property Bar Association
  • Social Housing Association

Qualification

  • MA: Jurisprudence (1998)

Education

  • Magdalen College, Oxford (1995)

If you expected to see yourself on this page, click here.