The LexisNexis Legal Aid Deserts Report 2026
Access to legal aid remains highly uneven across England and Wales.
Our 2026 analysis of the legal aid system in England and Wales found 14.49 million people, or 23.4% of the population, live in a local authority with a high need for legal aid and limited access to support.
Having access to legal advice, regardless of how much you earn, where you live or how freely you can travel, is fundamental to upholding the Rule of Law.
In this report we highlight where demand for legal support is high and access to legal aid may be weakest, in the hopes of encouraging broader debate about access to justice across the legal community.
Four years on from our first analysis, a troubling pattern has emerged: many of the areas we identified as legal aid deserts in 2022 haven't recovered. Seven of the 15 weakest-access housing deserts and eight of the 15 weakest-access crime deserts from 2022 remain deserts today. The same communities are stuck without access, year after year.
What's changed in 2026 is how deep that lack of access now runs in some places. South Norfolk is now a legal aid desert across all five areas of law we examined – housing, family, crime, immigration and employment. These are compounding failures: the same rural communities, largely across the East of England and East Midlands, facing high legal need on every front and support on none of them. For one person there, that could mean a family breakdown, a landlord dispute and an unfair dismissal — three entirely different problems, and nowhere to turn for any of them.
At LexisNexis, our mission is simple, but powerful. It’s to advance the Rule of Law around the world. It underpins what we do as an organisation and is fundamental to who we are. Our LexisNexis Rule of Law equation includes accessible legal remedy as a core part of the components that form the umbrella protection of the Rule of Law. Remove any element of the equation and justice leaks away; keep them together and societies thrive. Access to legal representation shouldn't depend on where you live, how much you earn, or how far you can travel to find help. When that access doesn't improve for years at a time, the Rule of Law itself is weaker for it and that gap becomes a pattern. This report isn't about apportioning blame, but enabling policymakers, providers and the wider legal community to keep the conversation going.
Josh Giddens, Executive Sponsor of Rule of Law at LexisNexis
Identifying legal aid deserts
There is no single agreed definition of a legal aid desert. For this report, we developed a comparative metric that assesses legal aid provider capacity against indicators of legal need in each local authority, classifying the lowest-scoring 10% of local authorities as legal aid deserts. This does not capture the whole problem, and nor does this mean that provisioning in areas outside this metric is “good”. On the contrary, there are many areas of challenge. However, to drive the conversation, it is important to identify the areas of greatest need.
The analysis draws on public data on legal aid provider locations, population, local authority geography and area-specific indicators of legal need across housing, family, crime, immigration and employment.
We focused on the following areas of the law:
Housing
Family
Crime
Immigration
Employment
Legal need was determined by the number of legal "incidents" in a local authority area (for example, domestic abuse cases, homelessness or crimes committed), while legal aid supply was determined by using the number of legal aid providers in a local authority area as a proxy.
Provider numbers offer an indication of legal aid supply, but the continued availability of that provision also depends on whether providers can sustain the work financially.
Law Society of England and Wales President Mark Evans says:
"There must be a guarantee that all of us can access justice regardless of where we live or how much money we have."
"Accessing legal aid should not be a postcode lottery but legal aid providers have been struggling to survive."
"The Law Society's research shows that 82% of sampled civil legal aid providers operate at a loss."
The findings indicate that provider numbers alone cannot capture the financial pressures affecting whether civil legal aid provision can be maintained.
We then calculated legal need and supply per 10,000 people to make local authorities with different population densities comparable. When calculating the need and supply of the local authorities, we also took into consideration the need and supply of neighbouring local authorities. We did this by measuring 15km from the centre point of a local authority to the centre point of a neighbouring local authority. For the sake of simplicity, our calculations ignore that need and supply might be split between two different neighbouring local authorities that are not neighbours.
The analysis takes neighbouring provision into account, but geographic proximity does not capture every barrier between a service being available and someone being able to use it.
Rebecca Wilkinson, Chief Executive of pro bono charity LawWorks, says: "A service might appear to be only half an hour away from a client, but if they're already struggling to make ends meet, the cost of a bus or train ticket can make that thirty-minute journey insurmountable."
And that's before you factor in taking time off work, arranging childcare or finding an available appointment, says Wilkinson.
"On paper, legal help may be nearby, but in reality it can still be incredibly difficult to access."
We then assigned a final metric to each local authority by dividing supply by need. The local authorities in the bottom 10% of that metric were given the title of legal aid desert.
It's worth noting that we were only able to work with the data available to us – a lack of data for many local authorities meant we had to make several other assumptions. Although these assumptions are not expected to materially affect the overall findings, the primary purpose of the maps below is to raise awareness of the limited access many people across England and Wales have to the legal aid system.
Our 2022 Legal Aid Deserts report can be viewed here.
Eligibility for legal aid depends on whether the issue is within scope, whether the person meets the financial eligibility rules and, for civil legal aid, whether the case satisfies the relevant merits criteria. More information is available here.
Our definition of a legal aid desert
A local authority where legal need appears comparatively high, but access to legal aid provision appears comparatively weak.
Legal aid desert percentage brackets
We characterised local authorities in the bottom 10% of the metric as being a legal aid desert.
Housing legal aid deserts
The analysis revealed:
- 6.6 million people fall into the Legal Desert category for housing legal aid
- Housing access remains weakest in a number of rural, coastal and semi-rural areas
- Some of the strongest-performing areas benefit from a combination of lower relative need, stronger local provider presence, and nearby authority coverage within 15 km.
To measure housing legal aid need, the analysis considered a range of current indicators including housing waiting lists, statutory homelessness, possession claims, and rough sleeping, and compared this with local legal aid provider capacity.
The findings suggest that housing legal aid access remains unevenly distributed. In some parts of England and Wales, people facing housing insecurity may have very limited local access to legal aid support, despite clear signs of need.
Experts believe a significant proportion of housing legal aid cases could be deescalated or resolved with access to early legal advice. Research from the Access to Justice Foundation, which provides free legal advice, support and representation across the UK, found 76% of its clients that received legal advice early on resolved their legal problems and avoided going to court.
The Foundation says: "In housing cases, advice at this early stage can challenge a defective notice, negotiate a repayment plan, access homelessness prevention resources, or resolve the underlying issue before it goes to court."
Jasmine Basran, Head of Policy and Campaigns at the national homelessness charity Crisis, says early legal advice can stop an eviction becoming a homelessness application.
"Without it, problems that could have been resolved cheaply and early can spiral, forcing people into temporary accommodation at far greater cost to the person and to the public purse."
"Being able to access housing legal aid can be the turning point that helps someone out of homelessness or helps them avoid it altogether."
Seven of the 15 legal aid deserts also appeared in the 2022 report: Doncaster, South Hams, South Kesteven, South Norfolk, Tendring, Stratford-on-Avon and Stevenage. The remaining eight — including Rushmoor, Cheshire East, South Holland, Blackpool, Surrey Heath, Swale, Stafford and South Ribble — are new to the 2026 analysis.
Local authorities with high access to housing legal aid include York, Carmarthenshire, Conwy, Powys, Flintshire, North Kesteven, Isle of Anglesey, Swansea, North Yorkshire, and Tamworth.
"What's so stark is how little has changed," says Basran. "Yet housing legal aid is more important than ever, as we continue to see homelessness rise."
With homelessness rising, the persistence of the same housing legal aid deserts suggests that access has failed to keep pace with need.
Family legal aid deserts
The analysis revealed:
- 4.15 million people fall into the Legal Desert category for family legal aid
- Access is weakest in a mix of rural, coastal and smaller district authorities
- Stronger-performing areas tend to combine higher provider availability with broader nearby coverage within the 15 km catchment
To measure family legal aid need, the analysis used current indicators including children looked after and domestic abuse-related demand, and compared this with local legal aid provider capacity.
The results suggest that family legal aid access remains highly uneven. In some areas, people facing acute family-related legal issues may have limited local access to support, even where signs of need are significant.
When legal aid deserts exist, particularly within the family law space, the rates of litigants-in-person are likely to increase, says Kirsty Brimelow KC, Chair of the Bar Council.
“The loss of legal aid eligibility leads to more litigants-in-person trying to navigate the complex legal system with little or no support, adding further delays into the system, increasing costs and causing distress to everyone involved in cases."
Moreover, the impact of family legal aid deserts extend beyond those seeking support, to the legal professionals struggling to satisfy overwhelming demand.
Brimelow continues:
"Family legal aid fees have not been increased since 1996 and have in fact been cut. Remuneration is now insufficient to support many family barristers in maintaining a sustainable legal aid practice. In turn, this has a detrimental impact on their wellbeing."
Six authorities are existing deserts carried over from 2022: South Holland, Melton, East Cambridgeshire, Rutland and Derbyshire Dales, and Wealden. The remaining nine — including Rother, South Norfolk, East Devon, Hastings, Babergh, West Oxfordshire, Swale, Harborough and West Lancashire — are new in 2026.
Local authorities with high access to family legal aid include Waverley, Redbridge, Enfield, Merton, Waltham Forest, Barnet, Brent, Haringey, Camden, and Kensington and Chelsea.
For people experiencing domestic abuse, the first attempt to obtain legal help can itself be a safeguarding issue.
Another barrier can be obtaining ongoing legal protection for the connected family matters that follow a proceeding.
Lynne Cumming, Director of Operations at charity Free Legal Advice Group for Domestic Violence, says: "Whilst it may be possible to obtain legal aid for an urgent protection order, the same survivor may then struggle to access publicly funded representation for divorce, children arrangements or financial remedies."
This creates a fragmented system where immediate protection may be achievable, but the longer-term legal issues needed to secure safety and independence remain unresolved, says Cumming.
Simon Bruce, Solicitor of the Supreme Court at pro-bono family law clinic Dad's House, says:
"Most of the clients whom we see at Dad's House are in crisis."
"If a client is not able to obtain legal advice, they will not know about the possibility of resolving issues through mediation. The longer this takes, the more elevated and chaotic these issues can become, making mediation even more difficult."
These findings show that limited access to family legal aid can leave people without support through urgent protection proceedings and the longer-term disputes that follow.
Crime legal aid deserts
The analysis revealed:
- 3.6 million people fall into the Legal Desert category for criminal legal aid
- Weaker access is concentrated in a number of smaller, rural and more dispersed authorities
- Better-performing areas benefit from either stronger local provider capacity, lower relative crime-related need, or both
To measure crime legal aid need, the analysis used crime data at police force-area level, then compared this with local criminal legal aid provider capacity. The findings show that access to crime-related legal aid is also uneven. In some authorities, people may face relatively high crime-related legal need but low accessible legal aid coverage.
Eight of the 15 legal aid deserts are pre-existing: Ribble Valley, Babergh, Rutland, Forest of Dean, East Cambridgeshire, Derbyshire Dales, East Hampshire and Torridge. Seven are new to this analysis: Stratford-on-Avon, South Norfolk, South Hams, West Berkshire, East Riding of Yorkshire, Breckland and East Lindsey.
Local authorities with high access to crime legal aid include York, Ipswich, Mid Suffolk, Swindon, West Suffolk, Bournemouth, Christchurch and Poole, Worcester, Malvern Hills, Waverley, and Wiltshire.
Brimelow from the Bar Council says legal aid "provides equality of arms between parties trying to resolve their disputes and enables citizens to exercise their rights through the courts."
Bar Council research has shown legal aid barristers are moving away from legal aid to seek better paid work.
“It is unacceptable that barristers increasingly are expected to work longer and longer hours on additional work in increasingly complex cases whilst fees are around 23% below the level they would have been if they had kept pace with inflation."
The impact this has on the public is profound, says Director of Casework at Advocate, Zoe Chan.
"Individuals frequently arrive at advice services experiencing significant stress, anxiety, and frustration, not only because of the circumstances that gave rise to their legal problem, but because of the difficulties they have faced in securing help."
Sometimes, these experiences can lead to a loss of confidence in the legal system itself and a mistrust of the legal advice they eventually receive, says Wilkie.
"When rights exist in theory but cannot be accessed in practice, public faith in the fairness and effectiveness of the justice system is inevitably weakened."
These findings suggest that the damage extends far beyond the individual case to confidence in the justice system itself.
Immigration legal aid deserts
The analysis revealed:
- 4.6 million people fall into the Legal Desert category for immigration law legal aid
- Some of the weakest-performing areas are smaller district authorities with low local provider capacity relative to current immigration-related support demand
- Better-performing areas include a mix of urban centres and Welsh authorities where support demand and local legal aid capacity appear more balanced
To measure immigration legal aid need, the model compares immigration-related demand with total local legal aid provider capacity, used as a proxy for accessible support.
The local authorities with the lowest access to immigration legal aid are South Norfolk, East Cambridgeshire, Derbyshire Dales, Babergh, East Devon, Rutland, South Oxfordshire, West Berkshire, Horsham, West Oxfordshire, East Hampshire, Wealden, Vale of White Horse, West Lancashire and Wychavon. The South East accounts for seven of the fifteen, with the East of England and East Midlands making up most of the remainder.
Local authorities with high access to immigration legal aid are Blaenau Gwent, Caerphilly, Conwy, Merthyr Tydfil, Rhondda Cynon Taf, Great Yarmouth, Neath Port Talbot, Bridgend, Lincoln, and Bromsgrove.
Chan from Advocate says:
"Without the knowledge, support, or representation necessary to understand and assert their legal and human rights, individuals may be unable to protect themselves against prosecution, persecution, or other legal actions."
When people cannot access the assistance needed to navigate the justice system, trust in the Rule of Law can quickly erode, undermining confidence that justice is accessible, impartial, and available to all.
Employment legal aid deserts
The analysis revealed:
- 4.1 million people fall into the Legal Desert category for employment law legal aid
- Stronger-performing areas include a mix of rural authorities, better-served urban areas and places with relatively favourable provider-to-population ratios
To measure employment legal aid need, the analysis used claimant count data as a proxy for employment-related legal pressure and compared it with total local legal aid provider capacity.
As with immigration, this should be understood as a measure of employment-related need relative to general legal aid capacity, rather than specialist employment provider coverage alone.
The local authorities with the lowest access to employment legal aid are South Norfolk, East Devon, Babergh, Rutland, East Cambridgeshire, Derbyshire Dales, Tendring, Swale, East Suffolk, South Holland, Breckland, West Berkshire, Fenland, Epping Forest and North Northamptonshire. The East of England dominates, accounting for nine of the fifteen, with the East Midlands making up most of the rest.
Local authorities with high access to employment legal aid are Westmorland and Furness, Ribble Valley, Mid Suffolk, York, Waverley, Enfield, Redbridge, Merton, Cotswold and Greenwich.
David Abbott, Chief Executive of the Free Representation Unit, says employee rights are of no use if people don't know about them or have limited access to support.
"Workers with a strong legal case are in danger of losing their rights because they haven't had access to legal advice."
The Free Representation Unit is a non-for-profit that represents people who are not eligible for legal aid in employment tribunals.
"Our services are no substitute for a comprehensive entitlement to legal advice that enables people to access the rights that Parliament has given them."
These findings show a clear gap in access to employment legal aid across many areas of England and Wales.
A final reflection from Ian McDougall, President of the LexisNexis Rule of Law Foundation
A safety net catches people after they have fallen, but a good legal aid system should also help prevent people from falling in the first place. From a Rule of Law perspective, people must be able to understand, exercise and enforce their legal rights in practice. Rights that exist on paper have limited value if people cannot realistically access a remedy.
Legal aid is one of the mechanisms through which access to remedy can be made meaningful, particularly for those who cannot pay privately. Timely advice can help some legal problems to be addressed before they become more difficult to resolve.
This report helps move the discussion beyond anecdote. Individual experiences reveal the human consequences of legal need, while data can identify geographical disparities and wider patterns that no single case can show.
The findings contribute to the evidence available to the legal community and highlight areas where further examination may be valuable. Where location affects someone’s realistic ability to obtain legal assistance, that deserves careful and continued scrutiny.
Find out more about the LexisNexis Rule of Law Foundation here.
This report was edited by:
Dylan Brown
Content & Thought Leadership at LexisNexis UK
My role is dedicated to reporting on the big topics impacting law firms and legal teams. I run extensive surveys, speak with legal leaders and research market developments to produce reports you hopefully find helpful.
Laura Halls
Content & Social Media Manager at LexisNexis UK
I turn expert knowledge into clear, credible content that people can understand, trust and use. Combining audience insight with editorial judgement, I shape articles, guides and resources that make complex topics easier to navigate and worth reading.
Maya Sternthal
Brand Marketing Executive at LexisNexis UK
I research and write about the major issues shaping the legal sector, with a focus on legal innovation, emerging technologies and the Rule of Law. My role involves sharing data-driven findings to market through reports, industry insights and content for legal professionals.