The following Employment Tax guidance note Produced by Tolley in association with Andy Williams at Charles Russell Speechlys LLP provides comprehensive and up to date tax information covering:
Claimants who bring successful wrongful dismissal claims to an Employment Tribunal or court, where these result in an award of compensation, may receive payment in respect of certain sums either before or after the date on which they would have received those sums had they remained employed.
Where a sum is received before the date on which it would have been received if the individual had remained employed, a discount for accelerated receipt may be appropriate, which is discussed below. Where a sum is received after that date, the claimant will be entitled to interest.
Accelerated receipt is the counterpart to interest. Interest compensates a party who did not receive money when it was due, because late payment deprived that party of the opportunity to invest it and earn interest on it.
Accelerated receipt involves discounting a compensation payment where money is received earlier than it would have been in the normal course (eg had it been received as ordinary monthly or weekly instalments of salary).
For example, consider a monthly-paid employee on a two-year fixed-term contract who is wrongfully dismissed one year after employment commences.
Even if the employer accepts their liability to pay compensation, and agrees that no deduction should be made for mitigation, it would still not be appropriate to pay a whole year’s worth of compensation in a lump sum because this would give the employee the benefit of the money earlier than he would have received it had he stayed and earned the money under the contract.
To calculate the appropriate damages sum, a straightforward discount for accelerated receipt could be applied by:
dividing the compensation into 12 parts
deducting from each part an amount representing the interest it could earn if invested between the actual date of payment and the date it was due to be paid as monthly salary under the contract (ie one month’s interest is deducted from the first part, two months’ from the second, etc)
The calculation could
**Free trials are only available to individuals based in the UK. We may terminate this trial at any time or decide not to give a trial, for any reason.
Access this article and thousands of others like it free for 7 days with a trial of TolleyGuidance.
Read full article
Already a subscriber? Login
There are several sets of provisions in the Taxes Acts which relate to ‘close’ companies, most of which are anti-avoidance measures aiming to catch transactions between those companies affected and their owners, where there may otherwise be a tax advantage. Broadly speaking, most owner-managed or
The corporate interest restriction (CIR) essentially limits the amount of interest expense a company can deduct from its taxable profits if the interest expense is over £2 million. The actual mechanics of the CIR calculation are highly complex (the legislation is over 150 pages long) and are
Class 1 and Class 1AClass 1 and Class 1A are the categories of NIC that can be charged on expenses reimbursed and benefits provided to employees. These classes are mutually exclusive. A benefit cannot be subject to both Class 1 and Class 1A NIC. Three requirements must be met before Class 1A NIC is
Preparatory workBefore completing the Inheritance Tax account for submission to HMRC, the practitioner needs to undertake a comprehensive review of the extent of the estate and its proposed distribution. The work required leading up to the submission of the account is described in detail in the
To view our latest tax guidance content, sign in to Tolley Guidance or register for a free trial.