The following Employment Tax guidance note Produced by Tolley provides comprehensive and up to date tax information covering:
Ever since its introduction in 2000, the off payroll (IR35) legislation has been consistently problematic. In particular:
the regime is viewed as unfair because it treats those within it as quasi-employees but without giving them employment rights. As a result, those affected by the regime have long campaigned for its abolition
it is often far from clear whether an individual’s engagements are within, or outside, the rules (see the Establishing employment status guidance note). This causes uncertainty for individuals who frequently need specialist advice
HMRC investigations are burdensome and can be so expensive that the business closes down
Each of these is discussed briefly below.
The original press release which introduced the first iteration of the legislation in 1999 said the rules were needed because personal service company (PSC) structures had damaging social consequences. Individuals working through PSCs:
“...may find their terms and conditions altered ― perhaps losing entitlement to sick pay or maternity leave. They may even lose their jobs without entitlement to notice or redundancy pay. They will usually have no right to any claim for unfair dismissal and may lose their entitlement to social security benefits through a failure to make adequate contributions.”
However, the introduction of the off payroll working rules (IR35) did nothing to address this situation. It deducts employee’s and employer’s NIC from the workers’ deemed salary, because the individuals are deemed to be ‘disguised employees’ of their clients. However, there is no employment law recognition for these individuals.. This means, for example, that individuals cannot claim unfair dismissal if their engagement is terminated, they have no rights to statutory redundancy and cannot normally obtain Jobseeker’s Allowance.
This has created a sense of unfairness about the whole regime, even before considering the practical issues fac
**Free trials are only available to individuals based in the UK. We may terminate this trial at any time or decide not to give a trial, for any reason.
Access this article and thousands of others like it free for 7 days with a trial of TolleyGuidance.
Read full article
Already a subscriber? Login
If an individual sells a chargeable asset and makes an allowable loss, how can this be relieved?First of all, since the simplification of capital gains tax from 6 April 2008, the proforma to calculate a loss is the same as the proforma to calculate a gain. See the Basic calculation principles of
IntroductionConsortium relief enables losses of a consortium company to be transferred to consortium members in proportion to the consortium member’s interest in the consortium company, and vice versa. Consortium relief is a flexible relief which is available in several different scenarios which are
What is quick succession relief?Quick succession relief (QSR) reduces the tax payable when the same property has been subject to more than one charge to IHT. It applies where there have been two chargeable transfers on which tax is payable within a period of five years.Although commonly called QSR,
What is structures and buildings allowance (SBA)?From 29 October 2018, expenditure on constructing a non-residential building or structure, or in certain cases, expenditure on acquiring such a building or structure, qualifies for an SBA. The following note has been updated for the changes announced