The following Employment Tax guidance note Produced by Tolley provides comprehensive and up to date tax information covering:
Ever since its introduction in 2000, the off payroll (IR35) legislation has been consistently problematic. In particular:
the regime is viewed as unfair because it treats those within it as quasi-employees but without giving them employment rights. As a result, those affected by the regime have long campaigned for its abolition
it is often far from clear whether an individual’s engagements are within, or outside, the rules (see the Establishing employment status guidance note). This causes uncertainty for individuals who frequently need specialist advice
HMRC investigations are burdensome and can be so expensive that the business closes down
Each of these is discussed briefly below.
The original press release which introduced the first iteration of the legislation in 1999 said the rules were needed because personal service company (PSC) structures had damaging social consequences. Individuals working through PSCs:
“...may find their terms and conditions altered ― perhaps losing entitlement to sick pay or maternity leave. They may even lose their jobs without entitlement to notice or redundancy pay. They will usually have no right to any claim for unfair dismissal and may lose their entitlement to social security benefits through a failure to make adequate contributions.”
However, the introduction of the off payroll working rules (IR35) did nothing to address this situation. It deducts employee’s and employer’s NIC from the workers’ deemed salary, because the individuals are deemed to be ‘disguised employees’ of their clients. However, there is no employment law recognition for these individuals.. This means, for example, that individuals cannot claim unfair dismissal if their engagement is terminated, they have no rights to statutory redundancy and cannot normally obtain Jobseeker’s Allowance.
This has created a sense of unfairness about the whole regime, even before considering the practical issues faced by those potentially affected.
Calls for the abolition of the off payroll rules (IR35) continue, but despite a recommendation by the Office of Tax Simplification (OTS) for its suspension, successive Governments have all been committed to keeping the rules,
**Free trials are only available to individuals based in the UK. We may terminate this trial at any time or decide not to give a trial, for any reason.
Access this article and thousands of others like it free for 7 days with a trial of TolleyGuidance.
Read full article
Already a subscriber? Login
‘Hold-over’ relief allows for the deferral of a gain that would otherwise arise in relation to a disposal. No capital gains tax (CGT) is due in respect of the disposal, but the base cost of the asset for the transferee for the purpose of a future disposal is reduced by an amount equal to the gain
This note offers guidance in respect of the administration of company tax returns. If a company or organisation is subject to corporation tax they will have to complete and file a company tax return for each accounting period. A company or organisation must, in the main, file a return even if they
The majority of state benefits (also called social security benefits) are managed by the Department of Work and Pensions (DWP) via the Jobcentre Plus.Some benefits are dependent on a national insurance contribution record (and different classes of national insurance provide different benefit
Income and gains may be taxable in more than one country. The UK has three ways of ensuring that the individual does not bear a double burden:1)treaty tax relief may reduce or eliminate the double tax 2)if there is no treaty, the individual can claim ‘unilateral’ relief by deducting the foreign tax
To view our latest tax guidance content, sign in to Tolley Guidance or register for a free trial.