The following Owner-Managed Businesses guidance note Produced by Tolley provides comprehensive and up to date tax information covering:
These are our brief notes and thoughts on cases published in the last week or so which caught our eye and are likely to be of particular interest to tax practitioners. Full case reports and commentary on most of these cases will be included within our normal reference sources in the coming weeks.
It is rare indeed for a taxpayer to seek an outcome under which a higher amount of tax is due than HMRC is arguing for, but that is the case here. The context is a partnership investment scheme of a similar type to the Icebreaker structure, where losses are found not to be available. Here the taxpayer said that they had been the victim of fraud. If relief for certain payments (which HMRC did not challenge) was disallowed, it would ‘better represent its view of the matter’ and ‘might assist it when bringing proceedings in the courts in respect of the fraud it alleged’.
The Tribunal rejected this on procedural grounds. The partnership’s appeal had been stood behind a lead case under the Rule 18 procedure and as a result, the decision in that lead case was binding on the Tribunal. The contested expenses had been allowed in that case and there were no grounds to apply a different conclusion here even though the taxpayer, for their own reasons, wanted a particular outcome.
Not many readers will want to challenge HMRC on the basis that their clients have not paid enough tax, but all involved in litigation will find the discussion on how the Rule 18 procedure works well worth studying.
What happens when a taxpayer self-assesses on the basis that they are non-domiciled but HMRC believes that they are UK domiciled? Here HMRC issued information notices to find out details of a person’s worldwide income (which would only be relevant if they were UK domiciled). The taxpayer did not comply,
**Free trials are only available to individuals based in the UK. We may terminate this trial at any time or decide not to give a trial, for any reason.
Access this article and thousands of others like it free for 7 days with a trial of TolleyGuidance.
Read full article
Already a subscriber? Login
Calculation of the effective tax rateAn international group’s effective rate of tax is usually calculated as the amount of tax it pays divided by its consolidated profits. The effective tax rate depends largely on:•the rate of tax paid by each company in the group•the companies in which profits are
IP COMPLETION DAY: 11pm (GMT) on 31 December 2020 marked the end of the Brexit transition / implementation period entered into following the UK’s withdrawal from the EU. At this point in time, key transitional arrangements came to an end and significant changes began to take effect across the UK’s
Introduction to the regimeThe aim of the patent box regime is to provide an incentive for companies to develop and retain patents and other qualifying intellectual property within the UK as part of the Government’s growth agenda. Finance Act 2012 originally introduced the legislation governing the
The reform of corporate losses within Finance (No 2) Act 2017 included a mixture of relaxations to the use of losses within the previous regime which applied before 1 April 2017 and also a major restriction (50% for most companies) on the amount of profits after 1 April 2017 that can be covered by
To view our latest tax guidance content, sign in to Tolley Guidance or register for a free trial.