The following Employment Tax guidance note Produced by Tolley in association with Emma Bartlett at Charles Russell Speechlys LLP provides comprehensive and up to date tax information covering:
Individuals who speak up to assert their rights under the Equality Act 2010 run the potential risk that they will be treated badly in retaliation. Not protecting working individuals who assert those rights would potentially entirely undermine the protection they enjoy against discrimination. The concept of unlawful victimisation exists to safeguard an individual's ability to assert his or her rights safely.
A person victimises an individual if:
he subjects that individual to a detriment
he does so because that individual undertook a protected act
It will be sufficient to establish victimisation if the perpetrator simply believes that the individual undertook or was going to undertake a protected act.
See Example 1 for a basic illustration.
In other words, in order to determine whether victimisation has occurred the following three step test can be used:
did the victim undertake a protected act (or the perpetrator believed that he had done so or may do so)? then
has the victim been subjected to a detriment? then
has he been subjected to that detriment because he undertook (or the perpetrator believed he has undertaken, or may undertake) the protected act?
If the answer to all is yes then victimisation is likely to have occurred.
Protected acts are:
bringing proceedings under the Equality Act 2010 (either against the person now victimising or against anyone else)
giving evidence or information in connection with any such proceedings under the Equality A
**Free trials are only available to individuals based in the UK. We may terminate this trial at any time or decide not to give a trial, for any reason.
Access this article and thousands of others like it free for 7 days with a trial of TolleyGuidance.
Read full article
Already a subscriber? Login
Terminal loss relief for trade losses in the final 12 monthsTrading losses incurred by a company in the final 12 months leading up to the discontinuance of trade may be carried back for up to three years from the period beginning immediately before that 12-month period. So if the final accounting
Income and gains may be taxable in more than one country. The UK has three ways of ensuring that the individual does not bear a double burden:1)treaty tax relief may reduce or eliminate the double tax 2)if there is no treaty, the individual can claim ‘unilateral’ relief by deducting the foreign tax
The corporate interest restriction (CIR) essentially limits the amount of interest expense a company can deduct from its taxable profits if the interest expense is over £2 million. The actual mechanics of the CIR calculation are highly complex (the legislation is over 150 pages long) and are
This guidance note considers the capital gains tax implications where shares are sold in exchange for new shares.The consideration paid by a purchasing company to the shareholder(s) for their shares in a target company could be in the form of either:•new shares in the vendor in exchange for shares
To view our latest tax guidance content, sign in to Tolley Guidance or register for a free trial.