VAT civil evasion penalty

Produced by Tolley
VAT civil evasion penalty

The following Value Added Tax guidance note Produced by Tolley provides comprehensive and up to date tax information covering:

  • VAT civil evasion penalty
  • Introduction
  • When will a person be liable to a civil evasion penalty?
  • What does the term evading VAT mean?
  • What is dishonest conduct?
  • Who can be liable to the penalty?
  • How is the VAT civil evasion penalty calculated?
  • How is the amount of VAT evaded or sought to be evaded calculated?
  • How is the penalty assessed?
  • Time limits for raising an assessment
    • More...

Introduction

This guidance note provides an overview of the VAT civil evasion penalty which could be imposed on a taxpayer.

It is important to note that current penalty legislation was introduced in FA 2007, Sch 24 and FA 2008, Sch 41, and one of these penalties will normally be levied by HMRC rather than the civil invasion penalty. The following penalties could be imposed by HMRC under the current rules:

  1. •

    penalties for failure to notify (see the Penalties for failure to notify guidance note)

  2. •

    penalties for inaccuracies (see the Penalties for inaccuracies in returns ― overview guidance note)

  3. •

    penalties for VAT wrongdoing (see the Penalties ― VAT wrongdoing guidance note)

If the taxpayer has failed to submit a VAT return and the their intention was to evade VAT, and their conduct involves dishonesty, then the person may still be liable to a civil evasion penalty under VATA 1994, s60.

A penalty for evading VAT was introduced in respect of cases where it can be proven that the sole proprietor, partnership’s or company’s conduct involves dishonesty.

The civil treatment of VAT evasion is an alternative to commencing with criminal proceedings but it is not intended to replace criminal proceedings if these are deemed to be more appropriate. Civil evasion penalties cannot be charged if the case has been criminally prosecuted or a compound penalty has been paid instead of criminal proceedings. However, late payment penalties and interest may still apply in these circumstances.

HMRC will only permit suitably trained officers to conduct civil investigations where they suspect that the taxpayer has evaded VAT.

See CEP8000 for a list of cases relating to the VAT civil evasion penalty that HMRC considers to be important that could be used in conjunction with this guidance note.

When will a person be liable to a civil evasion penalty?

The following criteria need to be satisfied before HMRC can levy a civil evasion penalty:

  1. •

    a person has done a specified act or has omitted to take

There’s no margin for error.
Think Tax.
Think Tolley.
TolleyGuidance gives you direct access to critical, comprehensive and up-to-date tax information and expertise you can rely on.
Take a free trial
Popular documents
LEXISNEXIS

Definition of a close company

There are several sets of provisions in the Taxes Acts which relate to ‘close’ companies, most of which are anti-avoidance measures aiming to catch transactions between those companies affected and their owners, where there may otherwise be a tax advantage. Broadly speaking, most owner-managed or

LEXISNEXIS

Withholding tax

IntroductionUK tax must be withheld on UK payments including:•interest•royalties•rental incomeWithholding tax may be reduced under double tax treaties (DTT) or European directives, both of which may be subject to making a formal claim.This guidance note outlines the rules for UK withholding tax, and

LEXISNEXIS

Capital vs revenue expenditure

Expenditure of a capital nature is not allowed as a deduction when calculating trading profits. Expenditure of a revenue nature is allowable, provided there is no specific statutory rule prohibiting a deduction and the expenditure also satisfies the wholly and exclusively test. See the Wholly and

LEXISNEXIS

Requirement for trust accounts

Duty to prepare trust accountsUnder the laws of England and Wales, trustees have a duty to account to the beneficiaries for their financial administration of the trust fund. This duty is established by a substantial body of case law. In the case of Armitage v Nurse, Millett LJ stated:“Every