The following Employment Tax guidance note Produced by Tolley in association with Philip Rutherford provides comprehensive and up to date tax information covering:
A large number of employers pay for the cost of relocation of their employees. Particularly this happens when the employer moves an employee from one location to another in order to perform his duties in that new location or where an employer takes on a new employee who has to relocate to take up his duties.
There is a broad-ranging exemption in place. However it only applies to certain types of expenditure in certain circumstances and is subject to an overall cap.
The legislation for the exemption is at ITEPA 2003, s 271 onwards. HMRC’s guidance is at EIM03100 onwards.
The exemption from tax applies to the first £8,000 of removal expenses where the reason for the relocation is that the employee is changing employer, taking up a new role within an organisation or changing the place where he is normally expected to carry out his duties. The exemption only applies where either the employer, or a third party, pays for the removal expenses or reimburses the costs borne by the employee. Where the costs are not paid for or reimbursed by the employer, the employee is not entitled to tax relief.
If an employee chooses to relocate, eg when taking up a new job, he cannot claim £8,000 of tax relief through his self-assessment tax return or form P87 if the amount was not reimbursed by the employer.
In order for the exemption to apply, a number of conditions must be met, as outlined below.
In order for the exemption to apply, the employee must actually change his main residence. The employer cannot give the employee an amount of £8,000 exempt of tax simply for taking up a new role or moving location by way of a bonus.
Similarly, an employer who simply pays for the relocation costs of an employee which is not within the exemption is simply settling the pecuniary liability of an employee and this would be taxable as
**Free trials are only available to individuals based in the UK. We may terminate this trial at any time or decide not to give a trial, for any reason.
Access this article and thousands of others like it free for 7 days with a trial of TolleyGuidance.
Read full article
Already a subscriber? Login
If the taxpayer does not have sufficient information to enable them to complete the tax return in the time allowed, they should include either a best estimate or a provisional figure. The taxpayer should not either leave a box blank or enter ‘details to follow’ as HMRC will regard this as an
Duty to prepare trust accountsUnder the laws of England and Wales, trustees have a duty to account to the beneficiaries for their financial administration of the trust fund. This duty is established by a substantial body of case law. In the case of Armitage v Nurse, Millett LJ stated:“Every
Close companies ― overviewMeaning of close companyThe tax rules for close companies are intended to address those companies that are closely controlled (ie by the owners and their families) and therefore could be used to manipulate the tax position of its activities and its investors. Therefore,
This guidance note considers the capital gains tax implications where shares are sold in exchange for new shares.The consideration paid by a purchasing company to the shareholder(s) for their shares in a target company could be in the form of either:•new shares in the purchasing company in exchange