The following Employment Tax guidance note Produced by Tolley in association with Hannah Freeman at Old Square Chambers provides comprehensive and up to date tax information covering:
Redundancy is a potentially fair reason for dismissal. Dismissal will be by reason of redundancy where it is wholly or mainly attributable to the fact that either:
the employer has ceased or intends to cease to carry on the business for the purposes of which the employee was employed, or to carry on that business in the place where the employee was employed
the requirements of that business for employees to carry out work of a particular kind, or for employees to carry out work of a particular kind in the place where the employee was employed, have ceased or diminished or are expected to do so
ERA 1996, ss 98, 139
Situations in which the above circumstances arise are generally referred to as ‘genuine redundancy situations’. A genuine redundancy situation arises where an employer’s business closes down in its entirety or at one particular workplace, or where an employer cuts its workforce in a particular area of work by a significant number. For example, if there are 100 production workers in an employer’s factory and a decision is taken that only 50 are now required, this will clearly give rise to a genuine redundancy situation in which 50 posts are potentially redundant.
However, where the employer’s business is reorganised but carries on after the reorganisation without any significant change in the number of employees, it may be more difficult to determine whether a redundancy situation has arisen.
Where there is doubt as to whether a situation leading to dismissal amounted to redundancy as defined in statute, it is often sensible for an employer to defend an unfair dismissal claim on the basis that dismissal was either by reason of redundancy or for ‘some other substantial reason’.
See the Redundancy ― an introduction guidance note and other supporting guidance notes in the Redundancy and reorganisation section for further information.
In some cases, a redundancy situation is
**Free trials are only available to individuals based in the UK. We may terminate this trial at any time or decide not to give a trial, for any reason.
Access this article and thousands of others like it free for 7 days with a trial of TolleyGuidance.
Read full article
Already a subscriber? Login
In certain circumstances shareholders may wish to pay dividends other than in proportion to their shareholdings. This aim is typically achieved by one or more shareholders not taking a dividend when it is declared. To effect this, the relevant shareholders must waive their right to dividends from
Universal credit is a non-taxable benefit that is administered by the Department of Work and Pensions (DWP) and is available throughout the UK. It is available to individuals on low incomes whether they are in work, unemployed or self-employed. It is designed as a replacement for several ‘legacy
Close companies ― overviewMeaning of close companyThe tax rules for close companies are intended to address those companies that are closely controlled (ie by the owners and their families) and therefore could be used to manipulate the tax position of its activities and its investors. Therefore,
The corporate interest restriction (CIR) essentially limits the amount of interest expense a company can deduct from its taxable profits if the interest expense is over £2 million. The actual mechanics of the CIR calculation are highly complex (the legislation is over 150 pages long) and are