The following Employment Tax guidance note Produced by Tolley in association with Hannah Freeman at Old Square Chambers provides comprehensive and up to date tax information covering:
Conduct is a potentially fair reason for dismissal. Dismissals for misconduct are probably the most frequent category of unfair dismissal claim brought before the employment tribunal.
Dismissal for an isolated incident of misconduct will rarely be fair, although, in some circumstances, the incident will be sufficiently serious to justify dismissal for a first offence. Generally, dismissal for misconduct will only be a reasonable sanction if the employee has committed earlier acts of misconduct and been warned that further incidents may lead to dismissal. The misconduct for which an employee is dismissed need not be of the same nature as the conduct for which the warning was imposed. The courts have held that a final written warning always implies, subject only to the individual terms of a contract, that misconduct of any nature will often, and usually, result in dismissal.
An employee is under a general obligation to follow lawful instructions given by the employer. The scope of the employer’s powers and the employee’s obligations will usually be set out in a written statement of terms and conditions or other contractual documentation. However, there may also be unwritten duties arising from custom and practice.
Fair dismissal may follow from a refusal to comply with an instruction to carry out normal duties. It may also follow from a refusal to follow an instruction to carry out new duties; for example, where a contract requires an employee to work at any of the employer’s workplaces within a reasonable commuting distance of his home, a refusal to transfer from one workplace to another may justify dismissal.
In certain circumstances, a dismissal may be fair even where the instruction in question was outside the scope of the employee’s contractual obligations; for example, where the employer believed that it was entitled to give the instruction even if as a matter of fact it was not. The lawfulness of the employer’s instruction is a relevant, but
**Free trials are only available to individuals based in the UK. We may terminate this trial at any time or decide not to give a trial, for any reason.
Access this article and thousands of others like it free for 7 days with a trial of TolleyGuidance.
Read full article
Already a subscriber? Login
OutlineWhen a property investor grants a lease, potentially this could be done on the basis that the tenant pays a premium for the initial grant of the lease, in addition to also paying rent over the term of the lease. In the absence of specific legislation to the contrary, such premiums would all
Generally speaking, inheritance tax (IHT) is charged only on transfers of value by individuals and trusts. However, to prevent avoidance of the tax, the charge is extended to participators in close companies where:•a close company makes a transfer of value, or•the share capital or loan capital of a
Investors’ relief is a capital gains tax (CGT) relief on the disposal of qualifying shares in an unlisted company. A taxpayer making a disposal that qualifies for investors’ relief will pay tax at a rate of 10%.Although it is a separate relief, the rules for investors’ relief were intended as an
This guidance note covers measures in place to allow taxpayers to defer VAT payments as a result of pressures faced due to the coronavirus pandemic.For an overview of the impact of coronavirus on VAT more broadly, see the Coronavirus (COVID-19) and VAT ― overview guidance note.See also the CIOT
To view our latest tax guidance content, sign in to Tolley Guidance or register for a free trial.