The following Employment Tax guidance note Produced by Tolley in association with Emma Bartlett at Charles Russell Speechlys LLP provides comprehensive and up to date tax information covering:
A person directly discriminates against another person where:
EqA 2010, s 13
For a discussion of what constitutes a protected characteristic, see the Protected characteristics guidance note.
Direct discrimination can never be justified. Once found it will always be held unlawful. There is one important exception to this blanket rule, which make a justification defence potentially available in the case of direct age discrimination. See the Justification of conduct guidance note.
If discrimination is not overt, but instead is the result of ordinarily acceptable treatment that disproportionately affects one group over another, it may constitute indirect discrimination. See the Prohibited conduct - indirect discrimination guidance note.
In a scenario where a person believes that they have been discriminated against they should first ascertain whether the discrimination was direct. In order to show that this was direct discrimination they will need to compare their own treatment with the treatment of a person in the same circumstances without their protected characteristic. If that comparison reveals that the person being compared with (a comparator) is or would be treated less favourably then direct discrimination has occurred.
See Example 1.
When attempting to determine whether or not direct discrimination has occurred it is important to distinguish between different, unreasonable, unfavourable and less favourable treatment.
Different treatment is not the same as less favourable treatment. It must be shown objectively that the treatment of the prospective claimant was worse than that of the comparator and not merely different.
Trivial differences in treatment will be disregarded by the tribunal or court. However, what an employer considers as trivial may be perceived as significant by the employee. A tribunal or court will not ignore the complainant's perception of the treatment when making a determination whether the tr
**Free trials are only available to individuals based in the UK. We may terminate this trial at any time or decide not to give a trial, for any reason.
Access this article and thousands of others like it free for 7 days with a trial of TolleyGuidance.
Read full article
Already a subscriber? Login
IntroductionSubsistence is the amount incurred as a consequence of business travel. Typically it relates to accommodation and meal costs incurred. These amounts are allowed because they are associated with the necessary travel. See the Travel expenses guidance note for more information of when
From 6 April 2015, an individual can elect to transfer 10% of the personal allowance (£1,250 in 2020/21 and 2019/20) to the spouse or civil partner where neither party is a higher rate or additional rate taxpayer. The legislation calls this the ‘transferable tax allowance’ but the GOV.UK website
Time for paymentTwo statutory rules apply on death:•tax is ‘due’ six months after the end of the month of death and carries interest from the ‘due’ date until paidThere is a possibility of payment by instalments, but this applies to certain types of property only ― see the ‘Availability of
Many people work from home either on an informal or a full-time basis. These people can be employed or self-employed, and their employment status affects the expenses they can claim as a deduction from their earnings.When dealing with someone working from home, it is important to remind him that
To view our latest tax guidance content, sign in to Tolley Guidance or register for a free trial.