The following Employment Tax guidance note by Tolley in association with Emma Bartlett at Charles Russell Speechlys LLP provides comprehensive and up to date tax information covering:
A person directly discriminates against another person where:
EqA 2010, s 13
For a discussion of what constitutes a protected characteristic, see the Protected characteristics guidance note.
Direct discrimination can never be justified. Once found it will always be held unlawful. There is one important exception to this blanket rule, which make a justification defence potentially available in the case of direct age discrimination. See the Justification of conduct guidance note.
If discrimination is not overt, but instead is the result of ordinarily acceptable treatment that disproportionately affects one group over another, it may constitute indirect discrimination. See the Prohibited conduct - indirect discrimination guidance note.
In a scenario where a person believes that they have been discriminated against they should first ascertain whether the discrimination was direct. In order to show that this was direct discrimination they will need to compare their own treatment with the treatment of a person in the same circumstances without their protected characteristic. If that comparison reveals that the person being compared with (a comparator) is or would be treated less favourably then direct discrimination has occurred.
See Example 1.
When attempting to
**Free trials are only available to individuals based in the UK. We may terminate this trial at any time or decide not to give a trial, for any reason.
Access this article and thousands of others like it free for 7 days with a trial of TolleyGuidance.
Read full article
Already a subscriber? Login
To view our latest tax guidance content, sign in to Tolley Guidance or register for a free trial.