Employment Tax

Prohibited conduct ― direct discrimination

Produced by Tolley in association with Emma Bartlett at Charles Russell Speechlys LLP
  • 21 Dec 2021 16:40

The following Employment Tax guidance note Produced by Tolley in association with Emma Bartlett at Charles Russell Speechlys LLP provides comprehensive and up to date tax information covering:

  • Prohibited conduct ― direct discrimination
  • There must be less favourable treatment
  • Different treatment
  • Unreasonable treatment
  • Unfavourable treatment
  • Discrimination must be on account of a protected characteristic
  • A comparator is required
  • Evidential or hypothetical comparators
  • Comparison in disability cases
  • Comparison in sexual orientation cases
  • More...

Prohibited conduct ― direct discrimination

A person directly discriminates against another person where:

They treat them less favourably than they treat or would treat othersThis is 'the treatment'
They do so because of a protected characteristicThis is 'the reason for the treatment'

EqA 2010, s 13

For a discussion of what constitutes a protected characteristic, see the Protected characteristics guidance note.

Direct discrimination can never be justified. Once found it will always be held unlawful. There is one important exception to this blanket rule, which makes a justification defence potentially available in the case of direct age discrimination. See the Justification of conduct guidance note.

If discrimination is not overt, but instead is the result of ordinarily acceptable treatment that disproportionately affects one group over another, it may constitute indirect discrimination. See the Prohibited conduct ― indirect discrimination guidance note.

There must be less favourable treatment

In a scenario where a person believes that they have been discriminated against they should first ascertain whether the discrimination was direct. In order to show that this was direct discrimination they will need to compare their own treatment with the treatment of a person in the same circumstances without their protected characteristic. If that comparison reveals that the person being compared with (a comparator) is or would be treated less favourably then direct discrimination has occurred.

See Example 1.

When attempting to determine whether or not direct discrimination has occurred it is important to distinguish between different, unreasonable, unfavourable and less favourable treatment.

Different treatment

Different treatment is

Access this article and thousands of others like it
free for 7 days with a trial of TolleyGuidance.

Think Tax.
Think Tolley.

Critical, comprehensive and up-to-date tax information

LEARN MORE LEARN MORE

Popular Articles

Taxation of loan relationships

The vast majority of companies will have loan relationships and so will need to consider how they are taxed under the loan relationship rules. There are also specific provisions dealing with relevant non-lending relationships and other deemed loan relationships. Companies are generally taxable on

17 Nov 2021 13:51 | Produced by Tolley Read more Read more

Transactions in securities and the Phoenix TAAR on a company sale or winding-up

The transactions in securities (TiS) legislation is anti-avoidance legislation aimed at situations where close company shareholders have engineered a disposal of shares to obtain a beneficial capital gains tax (CGT) rate, ie avoid income tax, on specified transactions.The targeted anti-avoidance

19 Oct 2021 08:18 | Produced by Tolley Read more Read more

Capital allowances computations

Plant and machinery allowancesThree types of allowance are available for expenditure on plant and machinery:•the annual investment allowance (AIA), which currently provides a 100% allowance for the first £1,000,000 of expenditure per year, see the Annual investment allowance (AIA) guidance

19 Oct 2021 08:11 | Produced by Tolley Read more Read more