The following Personal Tax guidance note Produced by Tolley provides comprehensive and up to date tax information covering:
To answer this question, we need to review the Arctic Systems case on the settlements legislation. As a result of the 2007 decision in this case (which the taxpayer won), it was announced that HMRC would introduce legislation to counter ‘income shifting’ between spouses and civil partners. So far, this has not occurred.
The settlements legislation is discussed in detail in the Income shifting guidance note and it is suggested that you familiarise yourself with that note before reading on.
HMRC’s approach in applying the settlements legislation to businesses was tested in the case of Jones v Garnett (often referred to in practice as Arctic Systems, which was the name of the company). The facts in this case are straightforward and common to many other small companies.
Mr Jones was an IT Consultant. He ran his own computer consultancy business via a company called Arctic Systems Ltd. His company was established for bona fide commercial reasons rather than to reduce tax liabilities and so he was not caught under the personal service companies anti avoidance provisions, see the Personal service companies ― overview guidance note.
The company had an issued share capital of two £1 ordinary shares. Mr Jones had subscribed for one £1 share. Mrs Jones (his wife) had subscribed for the other £1 share.
Mr Jones was the sole director (although he did not have a formal service contract) and his expertise generated the income of the company. He drew a small salary in return for working full-time.
Mrs Jones was the company secretary. She carried out administrative work
**Free trials are only available to individuals based in the UK. We may terminate this trial at any time or decide not to give a trial, for any reason.
Access this article and thousands of others like it free for 7 days with a trial of TolleyGuidance.
Read full article
Already a subscriber? Login
The substantial shareholding exemption (SSE) provides a complete exemption from the liability to corporation tax on the gains generated from qualifying disposals of shares and interests in shares by qualifying companies. Conversely, if losses are generated by the disposal and the SSE conditions are
Time for paymentTwo statutory rules apply on death:•tax is ‘due’ six months after the end of the month of death and carries interest from the ‘due’ date until paidThere is a possibility of payment by instalments, but this applies to certain types of property only ― see the ‘Availability of
Duty to prepare trust accountsUnder the laws of England and Wales, trustees have a duty to account to the beneficiaries for their financial administration of the trust fund. This duty is established by a substantial body of case law. In the case of Armitage v Nurse, Millett LJ stated:“Every
Class 1 and Class 1AClass 1 and Class 1A are the categories of NIC that can be charged on expenses reimbursed and benefits provided to employees. These classes are mutually exclusive. A benefit cannot be subject to both Class 1 and Class 1A NIC. Three requirements must be met before Class 1A NIC is
To view our latest tax guidance content, sign in to Tolley Guidance or register for a free trial.