The following Employment Tax guidance note Produced by Tolley provides comprehensive and up to date tax information covering:
Many people supply their services to clients, not directly as a self-employed person, but via a company. The tax and NIC advantages of this way of working are significant. See the Personal service companies ― overview guidance note.
There is anti-avoidance legislation, known as ‘IR35’, in place which catches individuals who would be employees or office holders of their clients if they did not use an intermediary, see the Establishing employment status and Anti-avoidance rules ― off payroll working (IR35) guidance notes.
This guidance note addresses how particular terms in a contract affect the likelihood of the off-payroll working (IR35) rules applying.
For further reading on the intermediary, see Simon’s Taxes E4.1005.
The legislation uses the term ‘intermediary’ for the person between the worker and the client in the contractual chain. Often this intermediary is a personal service company (PSC), but services provided via any set up, including the intermediary being a partnership or another individual are also within the rules.
The off-payroll rules (IR35) apply where a contract of employment or a contract to hold an office would have existed between the worker and the client had there been no intermediary in the contractual chain.
The legislation is thus based on imagining that there is a contract directly between the client and the worker. This is known as the ‘notional’ or ‘hypothetical’ contract. If this notional contract is one of employment or one to hold an office, the off-payroll rules (IR35) will apply. This is based on what is known as employment status and has developed through case law. For a summary of the employment status tests which determine whether a contract is one of employment or self-employment, see the Establishing employment status guidance note.
It is therefore necessary to first work out what would be in a notional contract, and apply the status tests to that notional contract to determine whether it would be a contract of employment.
In working out what would be
**Free trials are only available to individuals based in the UK. We may terminate this trial at any time or decide not to give a trial, for any reason.
Access this article and thousands of others like it free for 7 days with a trial of TolleyGuidance.
Read full article
Already a subscriber? Login
‘Hold-over’ relief allows for the deferral of a gain that would otherwise arise in relation to a disposal. No capital gains tax (CGT) is due in respect of the disposal, but the base cost of the asset for the transferee for the purpose of a future disposal is reduced by an amount equal to the gain
This guidance note explains the general rules surrounding the availability of indexation allowance on the disposal of company assets and provides information on the rebasing rules for assets held on 31 March 1982. For an overview of the general position regarding company disposals, please refer to
Duty to prepare trust accountsUnder the laws of England and Wales, trustees have a duty to account to the beneficiaries for their financial administration of the trust fund. This duty is established by a substantial body of case law. In the case of Armitage v Nurse, Millett LJ stated:“Every
Class 1 and Class 1AClass 1 and Class 1A are the categories of NIC that can be charged on expenses reimbursed and benefits provided to employees. These classes are mutually exclusive. A benefit cannot be subject to both Class 1 and Class 1A NIC. Three requirements must be met before Class 1A NIC is
To view our latest tax guidance content, sign in to Tolley Guidance or register for a free trial.